SootyChimney

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Eh. This still remains clearly a product of Ameri-centrism in my mind: An America-only issue was being touted as a global problem everyone should be aware of, so everybody else in the world who has never seen or even imagined this weird shit will regard it as so uncommon as to not matter. And no, I don't think one side was being particularly more 'calm and patient' than the other.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

You should honestly investigate how democracy actually works in China - You'll find that they have far more votes and actual choices for their officials than you ever have, and the approval rate of the government, even when anonymously/independently surveyed, is almost certainly higher than your country's.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I appreciate the honest tone. Is the dislike on politics threads emojis just emojis in general, or can we lay the blame on lemmy sizing bug?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That is not the assumption. You're obviously less likely to be involved any crimes labelled as 'extremist' or 'terrorist' if your skills lie in accountancy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago (8 children)

As a programmer, I've honestly met about one colleague who was actually reactionary. The rest have been pretty much fine and on the level. I don't know if it's just American programmers or I'm just a massive outlier, but I've never seen justification for this labelling in my own experiences.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I think this probably vastly overcomplicates the issue. 'extremists' in this article seems to refer mostly to terrorists or terrorist group members/leaders.

Why would engineers be overrepresented in terrorists or terrorist groups? Because they have the engineering knowledge to make bombs, tell others make bombs, or to do infrastructural damage. It seems a fairly straight forward mechanism of causation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I don't think "US and Canada do it" is a very effective argument for something being safe or reasonable. The reality is - We don't know what the effects are, and we can't even be completely sure they're doing what they say they are in the first place. The radioactivity may be low, but the presence of manmade tritium may well cause issues we don't even realise, and as always we're playing a gamble that "this number low so it's probably safe maybe". And that is undeniably a gamble, even if a low-risk one.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

This is so upsettingly uncannily a Simpsons bit - Rich guy eats fish contaminated by radioactive nuclear plant waste water discharged into natural sources to prove it's safe?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 years ago

The classic "I was going to be a caring individual and oppose systemic wrongs but a leftist said things I disliked on the internet" move.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Let's be clear, in the UK, parents can almost always leave behind over a million pounds worth before any tax starts kicking in. Not to mention the thousands of easy loopholes.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A pact that was a necessity when all the Allies rebuffed the USSR, but also a pact that documents show the USSR never even intended to honour from day one.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

I suspect pissing about copying a mass of text into an AI to have a 70% chance of getting an actually correct answer is probably harder than pressing Ctrl+F

view more: ‹ prev next ›