someguy3

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 months ago

I like how Canada used their old leopard 1s for target practice when we know now they could have been outfitted as Gepards

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 22 points 5 months ago

They'll also never care.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I read/skimmed the first 2 because they really went on. They seem to be reaching hard. A whole lot of flowery language to evoke an emotional response of unease. If they had anything real they would have gotten to the point. The only thing that was concrete (that I saw) was he said a study was on humans when it was on rats. Testing on rats is common and he could have misremembered.

*I did a ctrl+f on "Sarah" (his partner) and it comes up 56 times. Sure whatever form of cheating is bad, but this is the exact emotional stuff they went for. That's the kind of article it is. Fifty six times.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Why is he a snake?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 102 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Tell him the best employees will quit. The rest will be too burnt out to actually do anything truly productive.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 months ago

Community context: Fake, Androids don't die.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

What does "&udm=14” do?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Jesus wouldn't accept it from the entire conversation we had, someone else even chiming in. Next time look it up yourself if you don't believe anything instead of shoving refusal in everyone's face until someone finally had enough. Why do I bother.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

ACKSUALLY you didn't. The news writers saw it and told you, I saw it and told you, other people saw it and told you, everyone saw it and told you. You would not accept it. You jumped through every hoop you could and blamed everyone else to not accept it. Ciao.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Jesus the article and everyone is telling you what happened and you just won't accept it.

 

We saw his father, his mother, his grandfather, his brother, his other brother, and his daughter. Not too shabby for an Android.

 

I found this fascinating, and interesting history.

 

Or to load a whole bunch at once so you can Ctrl+F? I used to use RES on the other site to do that.

 

I use an old mixed nuts container.

141
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/til@lemmy.world
 

Maximum, that is.

1 child policy from 1979 to 2015.

2 child policy from 2015 to 2021.

3 child policy since 2021.

The announcement came after the release of the results of the Seventh National Population Census, which showed that the number of births in mainland China in 2020 was only 12 million, the lowest number of births since 1960, and the further aging of the population, against which the policy was born.[5] This was the slowest population growth rate China experienced.[6]

Although the CCP government had high expectations for the new policy,[16] in a 2021 online poll conducted by the state media Xinhua on its Weibo account, using the hashtag #AreYouReady for the new three-child policy, about 29,000 out of 31,000 respondents stated they would "never consider it."[15]

26
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

Or is it avoided like smoking in cars?

6
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/videos@lemmy.world
 

[I don't think it was responsible for literacy rates like it suggests, but still very good vid.

view more: ‹ prev next ›