snipgan

Twitter, as far as I have recalled, has almost always been a cesspool for hot takes and hate. Just with Elon in charge the flood gates have really opened and has acquired a particular flavor mimicking his own tastes.

The real question now is if this will ultimately lead to the ban or slow death of Twitter. People really can only put up with so much vitriol.

Many countries are lining up with laws and bill coming after social media, usually under the goal or "goal" of protecting kids, so we will see how things turn out. Might even be a quicker death/change then.

It is an error on you.

"I predict there'll be some convictions," speculated the lawyer. "I think the strategy is to get bad convictions, but to get them fast," he continued, saying that Trump would then be able to appeal the decisions, after the election. Dershowitz argued that this is the reason prosecutors are "rushing" to get their cases against Trump to trial.

He didn't just say Trump would win on appeal or "He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals." He predicting the approach of the prosecutors and said more than this.

You are being dishonest.

And why does that? His reasoning he states in the articles?

He believes there will be convictions but overturned in appeals.

This what you said, correct?

"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

This is what he said correct?

Again. He didn't say that. You are incorrect.

I didn't say anything otherwise.

I just showed you what he said in the articles you provided.

That's not what Dershowitz said.

No he didn't.

"They're going to get on the bandwagon," Dershowitz said of prosecutors. The "approach is to get him before the election, convict him before the election, and he wins on appeal."

"They're all going to raise it," said Eric Segall, a law professor at Georgia State University. "Trump is going to argue that he and all his merry people were simply ensuring the integrity and fairness of federal elections, something they had an obligation to do, and therefore he has immunity."

Segall said the laws protecting federal officials from state prosecution serve an important purpose. Consider, for instance, federal officials working to desegregate the South during the civil rights era being thrown in jail by state officials opposed to those efforts. But Segall stressed that he doesn’t believe the facts of Trump's intervention will warrant immunity.

He saying that's their approach. Ultimately might come down to the Supreme Court which hasn't favored Trump and similar cases so far.

I guess with that said, what does the female demographic think about Morrigan/Lae'zel?

Even if they are a smaller portion, do they feel the same way or are they significantly differently?

Well........I don't think so?

People love Morrigan from DA:O and she's pretty much a jackass. Made me want to pull my hair out at times, but there's a charm in that making a bad girl go soft in the end.

We shouldn't just slap or imply a "sexist" label when people don't like a character or not, although there's always going to be a variance.

Is there a good example or reason they say this or are they just guessing?

Same.