shapesandstuff

It was pretty much the same context for me, yeah.

Opsec always applies

Is there any way to check that?

Iirc holding both the entry and exit of a routed connection, you can in theory match traffic going through, which would let you connect a user to the server/site they are connecting to. It might still be encrypted at that point, idk the details anymore.

So when I first learned about TOR almost 10 years ago in uni, it was said to be compromised to a significant extent by secret services holding entry and exit nodes.

Is that not true anymore?

A lot of it boils down to mindfulness.

When I realise my mind is wandering into anxiety territory where I make up scenarios that stress me out, take a few deep breats (box breathing is nice for this), focus on where I am right now and what I'm doing. What is actually true right now.

Take time for hygiene. I got long hair so I only wash it about once a week, using a specific soap, that smells and feels nice, condition it with a vinegar solution, rinse thoroughly.
I also brush it every day and tend to wax my beard when I go out and trim it regularly.

I'm still pretty shaggy but in a way that I enjoy personally.

Besides these, I have very active hobbies, that I stick to once or twice a week. I get to physically exhaust myself, interact with people outside my daily routine, work on my skills to get better. I picked up reading again in my late 20s after over a decade of losing that interest. It clears my head in the evening when reading in bed and I'd say that habit improved my sleep.

A lack of sentence does not necessarily mean they were false accusations

looking at them online, I'd guess you could put them through button holes or maybe even boot eyelets?

That's actually a big one for me too. I have an extension running called "minimal consent" but it's deprecated and never managed the more complicated dialogues. I also disable personalised ads on every platform (often defaults to enabled)
It's sometimes annoying but all in all, I get the most random ads and i'm happy about it. As a rule of thumb, if the cookie dialogue does that spinny "saving prefernces" loading screen for more than 10 seconds, the page probably wasn't worth my click anyway and I close it.

Certainly, continuous droughts dry out a forest, setting it up for am idiot (or lightning strike) to set it on fire. It's a bit of a nitpick but technically the higher temps don't necessarily make the forest more dry, but yeah climate change does include droughts and extreme weather events.

Spontaneous combustion like in moist haybales or as described in the article you linked, via fermentation sure does exist, not really in the wild. Like in a forest. The entire wikipedia page is about specific circumstances, none of which happen naturally.

Eg there shouldn't be any manure piles out causing wild fires. If there are, its again caused by idiots.

I dont have numbers on rock sparks causing fires but it kinda sounds exceedingly rare?

Like all of these points seem like they would be a fraction of a fraction of the causes for forest fires.

By and large, firest will not self ignite. If you see a raging fire on the news, its overwhelmingly unlikely to be anything but an idiot to blame.

Reminder that under 250-300C forests don't self ignite.

Lightning strikes or idiots are the cause. And iirc idiots lead the statistics something like 10:1

So petrichor-y?