CO2 isn’t pollution* fyi.
Edit: I think I misread your comment, but to expand on what I mean, some people use CO2 emissions as a way to slam measures to reduce pollution that is toxic to nature, such as catalytic converters and plastic tax. I think this is possible because people confuse the concepts of "We shouldn't poison nature" and "We should stop climate change", which are both technically issues of pollution.
Question from an idiot to the anti-MMT crowd: Should Stalin not have built factories if it had cost too many tax rubles?
Disgusting.
IDK what the fuck you're talking about. I haven't had math homework since 6th grade, but even back then the vast majority of practice was done during the lessons.
Actually, business owners aren't real because no one has ever seen a business owner: https://twitter.com/K_Niemietz/status/1704182743163179194
Most normal greeting...
spoiler
in Ohio!
What kind of car?
Ok, I see there are different definitions of pollution. I should say that CO2 is a very different kind of pollution from tyre particles.
Edit: There might be a language barrier here. I’m sorry if it was upsetting.