Who on the house floor actually occupies this position. It's only rhetoric used in debate netween regular people.
samson
joined 2 years ago
If you tell the firefighter to start saving dogs because you love them and they institute a policy of saving all animals in response everyone wins, regardless of motivation. You can do both, this isn't a zero sum game.
This doesn't stop anything though again. Unless you tax them out of business, they will still be a monopoly and will fix prices for their profit. Less profit is still profit.
If you tax them too high they will either seek recourse via illegally bribing politicians (or "lobbying") to have those taxes removed, or monopolise with legally distinct businesses where wealth is concentrated in the few regardless.
It's a fantasy though. An extremely competitive market would be nice, but in reality it would be a race to the bottom and those who started with more cash would win out, buy up or starve the competition and monopolise, giving them the extra space to be lazy and pass on profits to their shareholders, who dictate increased prices to increase their margins.
He didn't violate it.
Unless you can point to an animal that destruction is actively supported by aboriginal people on the basis of culture, this is a straw man argument.
Yep, there's eligibility requirements, but in practice that means just lie about a reasonable one for you.
What a sad day it is 😂
It's not just religion, it's culture. You can legislate against hurting animals and you can have your reason and those who have cultural practices that align with it can have theirs. It's really not a problem.
Yep, the caveat is if you're voting interstate you need to find an interstate voting centre. If you go through the aec site and hit I don't live in X state it will show you the interstate centres.
Ooo will there be how to vote ~~cunts~~ beautiful people hanging about at the polls?
This shit is crazy thanks for letting me know