Anarchoprimaaprilis
Niezależnie od poziomu treści, lepiej pójść gdziekolwiek indziej — na przykład Panoptykon i Internet Czas Działać.
Notabene, ludzie z ICD się wypowiadali w tym wątku, więc oczywiście efekt taki, że "Prywatnie[.]EU" zapodało im banana. 🤣
Ok, I should have been more specific: the way it is often framed (and the way I have seen it framed, and how the linked article frames it) is as if these were US-affiliated labs working on bioweapons. That is not what Nuland said. Biological research facilities do not have to be bioweapons labs, just as explosives research facilities need not be arms manufacturers.
Greenwald (the author of the linked article) of course does what Greenwald recently is hell-bent on doing, which is to try to scandalize anything he can. I used to respect the man, but that was a long while ago.
We can walk and chew gum. We can recognize problems with US imperialism, and problems with Russian imperialism.
And calling 2014 elections a "coup" is denying Ukrainians their agency. I've been to Ukraine, I've worked with Ukrainians, and I had visited Janukovych's former residence near Kyiv. A journalism conference is organized there every year these days. 2014 was the Ukrainian people showing the finger to Putin and his lackeys.
The only "world power" (as laughable as it currently is) trying to "conquer" anything right now is Russia. Enough with this Kremlin-propaganda-parotting tankie crap.
This will help:
The source is well-worth visiting and taking the time to read, plenty of additional info!
He's basically wrong about everything he talks about, and it's been the case for quite a while.
I especially appreciate the Ubuntu font used to make that meme
My Dog, "hackers hacking a hack".
Can we please stop using the word "hacker" when we mean "cybercriminals", "attackers", "malicious agents"? We have plenty better terms. Like... "cybercriminals", "attackers", "malicious agents": https://rys.io/en/155.html
I mean, I get the need for clickbaity titles and all, but surely we can do better.
Ancaps are libertarians cosplaying as anarchists.
Why they feel they need to abuse the "anarchist" label like that is anyone's guess. Perhaps they think it sounds cool?
Yup. The problem is that these users will have trouble understanding how can it be "Mastodon" without being Mastodon, if you get my drift. Plus, ideally this would also be done by Mastodon-the-software project — "if you want functionality X, check out instances of this compatible-but-different software project."
But absolutely, doing so yourself in such cases makes perfect sense.