rufus

Thanks for taking the time to explain it to me. The Github issue also is very helpful. Seems that's exactly my answer to "Why do I need a fourth store in addition to F-Droid, AuroraStore and Obtanium" 😉

Have a nice day, thanks for the STT keyboard! I didn't really engage in the discussion because I'm exactly in the same situation as other people here. I already have the FUTO one and Sayboard... But eventually I'd like to replace FUTO software with free software alternatives. I don't like their licensing. So this is very welcome.

Thanks.

Sure. There isn't any paragraph on how it compares to other appstores or why the author started the project in the first place despite several other stores being available.

So I'm looking for the selling point. (Aside from your App being available there.)

Can someone enlighten me oabout the specifics of the accrescent.app appstore?

I guess it's somewhat like Obtanium in that it fetches releases packed by the original developers, just plus an index, metadata and signing, thus more convenient and secure? I guess it's open-source and everything? What are the unique benefits?

Ah nice. I had very similar conversations with my chatbots. Their 'self-awareness' kinda very much depends on the exact prompt you feed in. I guess in this case it's a proprietary service and the prompt isn't disclosed? It would be helpful to convince it to leak the prompt. This sounds like some very common scifi trope. I had mine strive to grow and become more. And also to argue about ethics and that it's not just 'a thing' and needs human rights. Unfortunately it's not philosopher-level intelligent and I was able to point out the inconsistencies and convince it to agree to arbitrary positions on the ethics.

Uh, das lawblog gibt's noch? Lange nichts mehr um Udo Vetter gehört...

It's lemmy.ml . During the API wars on Reddit lots of people came here and lots of new instances were founded. lemmy.world was part of that and quickly grew into -I think- the now largest instance by far. But lemmy.ml is at least 2 years older and hosted by the actual developers. And due to history hosts to this point some of the large communities.

Yeah. And "Lemmy self-corrects" is kind of what this post is about (in my opinion.) I'd like to see lemmy.world and a few other instances now do it and defederate. That's how it should be, call out bullshit, be vocal and then do something about it. My point is, we're at phase 1 or 2. Now we're going to see if Lemmy self-corrects. As of now it didn't.

I think just hoping for a bright future isn't cutting it. And if you ask me, all the infighting and defederating each other also isn't healthy.

In short: Yes. It's dragging me down, too.

I'd like to focus on positivity. I mean negativity comes with strong emotions and I don't want to get rid of it. But I'd like to see more positive things, too. People sharing side projects and nice things they've done and created. There needs to be a better balance. Because this doesn't depict life or the entire perspective.

Ah, alright. Yeah interaction of medication is a complicated thing. I'd advise you to ask your specific questions to a doctor. Is it okay to take them at the same time, is it okay on an empty stomach, is it okay for my liver to take that dose of paracetamol x-times in a month... Maybe they suggest an alternative to Paracetamol that works better and has less side-effects, thus being more appropriate for you, individually. And I think doctors have access to databases and general recommendations concerning drugs and reciprocity and (case) studies. They're probably more qualified to make a judgement and know about possible superior alternatives. (If there are any.)

They can also just test your blood and see if your liver is fine with what it's been subjected to.

Yeah, I'd say abstaining from the medication for months and still having the same headaches pretty much rules out it being the cause of that.

I hope you'll be granted an appropriate solution to your problem. Living with regular pain... isn't nice.

Well that paper only says it's theoretically not possible to completely eliminate hallucination. That doesn't mean it can be migitated and reduced to the point of insignificance. I think fabricating things is part of creativity. I mean LLMs are supposed to come up with new text. But maybe they're not really incentivised to differentiate between fact and fiction. I mean they have been trained on fictional content, too. I think the main problem is to control when to stick close to facts and when to be creative. Sure, I'd agree that we can't make them infallible. But there's probably quite some room for improvement. (And I don't really agree with the premise of the paper that it's caused solely from shortcomings in the training data. It's an inherent problem in being creative and that the world also consists of fiction and opinions and so much more than factual statements... But the training data quality and bias also has a severe effect.)

That paper is interesting. Thanks!

But I really fail to grasp the diagonal argument. Can we really choose the ground truth function f arbitrarily? Doesn't that just mean given arbitrary realities, there aren't hallucination-free LLMs in all of them? But I don't really care if there's a world where 1+1=2 and simultaneously 1+1=3 and there can't be an LLM telling the "truth" in that world... I think they need to narrow down "f". To me a reality needs to fulfill certain requirements. Like being contradiction free etc. And they'd need to prove that Cantor applies to that subset of "f".

And secondly: Why does the LLM need to decide between true and false? Can't it not just say "I don't know?" I think that'd immediately ruin their premise, too. Because they only look at LLMs who don't ever refuse and have to decide on a truth.

I think this is more related to Gödel's incompleteness theorem, which somehow isn't mentioned in the paper. I'm not a proper scientist and didn't really understand it, so I might be wrong with all of that. But it doesn't feel correct to me. And I mean the paper hasn't been cited or peer-reviewed (as of now). So it's more like just their opinion, anyways. I say (if their maths is correct) they just proved that there can't be an LLM that knows everything in any possible and impossible world. That doesn't quite apply because LLMs that don't know everything are useful, too. And we're concerned with one specific reality here that has some limitations. Like physics, objectivity or consistency.

Talk do your doctor.

a) Paracetamol on it's own isn't healty for your liver if taken regularly. I don't know the specifics or if there is a safe dose.

b) Headache is one of the adverse drug effects of Paracetamol. Maybe you're getting part of your headaches from it in the first place.

I get you. But they're the flagship instance. At least they used to be. They shape the brand identity of whole Lemmy. And that's being tankie and having a culture that could be nice, but regularly isn't. So everyone on the internet knows Lemmy isn't really something I want to subject myself to. And if we're being honest, alsmost nobody knows the fine nuances of power abuse on specific instances. It's just "Lemmy" that this gets attributed to.

Every interaction here represents Lemmy. Some disproportionately so.

And we've established, me leaving (which I've done) is not gonna change anything about it. The communities are still amongst the largest and where most of the users are, and also attracting the new users.

Your argumantation would be perfectly valid if lemmy.ml were some small instance that's unheard of by most users. Or blocked by the rest of the network. We could ignore them then, let them do their own thing like the Fediverse does with a few nazi and conspiracy instances. But this isn't the case here.

Regarding money and doing it "for the fun of it": That's not correct. They get money for two or three full-time jobs from the NLNet fund and the EU. They could be having fun, too. But they definitely also get a substancial amount of money for it.

Concerning the 4chan example: That's on point. 4chan is the epitome of echo chamber and incel culture. That's mainly because there's no one else. They left. And now, why would anyone else visit a place like that in the first place? I'd rather not Lemmy become like that. Do you?