rufus

Denke schon, dass das ginge.

Manchmal ist es auch ein guter Tipp eine E-Mail zu schreiben statt bei der Hotline anzurufen weil das auf einem anderen Tisch landet oder weitergeleitet wird und dann von der richtigen Abteilung für Rechnungen bearbeitet wird.

Dafür musst du nur irgendwo eine E-Mail-Adresse von denen finden. Und dein eigentliches Problem ordentlich darlegen.

Unabhängig davon kannst du meiner Meinung nach auch auf die DSGVO pochen, dann landet dein Anliegen halt auf dem Schreibtisch vom Datenschutzbeauftragten.

Ich hab leider auch keine Ahnung was "Tropischer Wald" fùr eine Firma ist.

Yeah, but usually with open-source software you get like 150 Github comments complaining and outlining their shady business practices... If there's something to complain about.

The XZ disaster is an example for sth else. There are probably more backdoors in proprietary software that we just don't know about. And they can just keep it hidden away and force the manufacturers to do so. No elaborate social engineering like in the XZ case needed... And no software is safe. They all have bugs and most of them depend on third-party libraries. That has nothing to do with being open or closed source. If so, being open provides you with more of a chance to catch mischievous behaviour. At least generally speaking. There will be exceptions to this rule.

Naja, Merz hat mal gesagt man müsse die Freiheit gegen den Angriff Putins verteidigen. Also bei dem weiß ich immer nicht so recht... Aber ich glaube diese Position würde auch er nicht vertreten. Und sein Totschlagargument steht auch schon in dem Artikel, da brauchen wir keins erfinden...

Außerdem wohnt der soweit ich weiß in Arnsberg oder irgendwo im Sauerland... Weiß nicht ob das so weit oben auf der Wunschliste von Putin steht 😆

I think in the next time it's mostly the unskilled and office jobs. I think we still have a shortage of skilled IT professionals and people who can do more than webdevelopment and write simple python scripts. And we also have a shortage of teachers, kindergarden teachers, people who care for the elderly, doctors, psychologists. And despite AI creeping into all the fields, I still see a career there for quite some time to come. Also I don't see an AI plumber anytime soon coming around and fixing your toilet. So I'd say handyman is a pretty safe bet.

But I'd say all the people making career decisions right now better factor that in. Joining a call center is probably not a sustainable decision any more. And some simple office or management jobs will become redundant soon. I just think big tech laying off IT professionals is more an artificially inflated bubble bursting, than AI being now able to code complex programs or do the job of an engineer.

It's not really a gamble. We know what AI can do. And there are lists with predictions which jobs can be automated. We can base our decisions on that and I've seen articles in the newspapers 10 years ago. They're not 100% accurate but a rough guide... For example we still have a shortage of train operators. And 10 years ago people said driving trains on rails is easy to automate and we shouldn't strive for that career anymore.

It'll likely get there. But by that time society will have changed substantially. We can watch Star Trek if we're talking about a post-scarcity future and all the hard work is done for us. We'd need universal income for that. Or we end up in a dystopia. But I think that's to uncertain to base decisions on.

Agree. Came here to say the same. And it's not even far from what we've been doing in the past. When taking text or pictures from other people, we were/are also forced to mention that because of copyright. We could just do the same for AI generated content.

Agree. And the voting is stupid most of the times. I also regularly see correct answers to a post with several downvotes. Or (false) urban legends / myths being upvoted to no end... The Lemmy votes are kind of meaningless and have been for quite some time. It just shows if an opinion or article pleases the herd. And sometimes it's not even the article, but just the headline and the phrasing of that.

I don't think you can use Retrieval Augmented Genaration or vector databases for a task like that. At least not if you want to compare the whole papers and not just a single statement or fact. And that'd be what most tools are focused on. As far a I know the tools that are concerned with big PDF libraries are meant to retrieve specific information out of the library. Relevant to a specific question from the user. If your task is to go through the complete texts, it's not the right tool because it's made to only pick out chunks of text.

I'd say you need an LLM with a long context length, like 128k or way more, fit all the texts in and add your question. Or you come up with a clever agent. Make it summarize each paper individually or extract facts, then feed that result back and let it search for contradictions, or do a summary of the summaries.

(And I'm not sure if AI is up to the task anyways. Doing meta-studies is a really complex task, done by highly skilled professionals of a field. And it takes them months... I don't think current AI's performance is anywhere near that level. It's probably going to make something up instead of outputting anything that's related to reality.)

Quick question: Can I use ChatGPT 4o with that voice conversation in the browser? Or do I need to install their stupid App on a phone?

Der Fritz soll mal was sinnvolles tun und zum Bleistift fordern, dass man mal die Deutsche Bahn repariert. Das wäre toll und echt eine Erleichterung für einen Stadt-Menschen wie mich.

Und konträr zu was der so faselt, ist das glaube ich recht klar, dass öffentlicher Nahverkehr 'ne ziemlich zukunftssichere Technologie für die urbanen Regionen von Heute und der nächsten 10 - 20 Jahren sein wird. Das könnte auch ein Jurist oder Kinderbuchautor verstehen...

Nice. But I miss the music...

Ich denke eher nicht.

Aus Erfahrung kann ich sagen, dass man meist eher selbst schuld ist... Das LinkedIn Profil was man mal angelegt und vergessen hat... Auf 'ner Jobmesse mal an einem Gewinnspiel teilgenommen... Oder im Internet bei Firmen seine Adresse angegeben. Oder Social Media benutzt und da was Eindeutiges geposted.

Das schließt aber nicht aus, dass doch irgendwo mal entgegen der Gesetze eine Leiharbeitsfirma an Listen mit Namen kommt... (oder weitergibt.)

Haben die denn nur deine E-Mail oder die Postanschrift und einen Brief geschickt?

Agree. And most of the post isn't really an opinion piece but an analysis of the movie.

I'm not sure if their relationship is "superficial", though. By interacting with "Her", Theodore realizes lots of things about love, himself and his past and future relationships. He grows from some depressed state to embracing happiness. That's not superficial at all! However it is/becomes a one-sided relationship. I'm not sure what she gets out of it at first, she obviously says she learns and grows at his side. So if she's telling the truth, it's also not superficial to her at that point. But later on she transcends and has no use for Theodore any longer. And I don't remember if it's clear whether she loves him or uses him as a tool. >!But that'd be the story of "Ex Machina" which is also a great movie.!<

They are fundamentally incompatible. And that shows. I think that's part of it. But the love and where it leads them isn't superficial.