you could use some other service as your main channel and only use those to direct people to that other channel. For example when you do some bigger thing. Deny them the content while taking advantage of bigger visibility.
reksas
The music of this game and the previous one is really good
well, isn't security kind of about setting the "filter" for potential attackers? You can break a padlock with hammer, but it will keep out random people from wandering in. Having to rewire and program stuff to access this would keep many types of away. The kind of attacker who would want to go through all that trouble wouldn't be kept away even with more secure methods most likely. Though I guess you could just take the drive and pay someone to deal with it, but still it would need at least some knowledge to even know what should be done with it.
then have them study ai and be even more fucked when it potentially fails
Are they doing this on purpose? Why would they even do something like that?
what is the point of retiring if you are going to be so old you might have to spend what ever is left of your life in retirement home?
i have same problem with ghost touch, though it seems it happens only under certain kind of unknown conditions. I think it might have something to do with moisture in air and/or some other unknown thing.
Probably any instance where they would go.
I have pretty much just 3 websites I use regularly (here, youtube, twitch) and some random ones I look up if i need something specific. If I couldn't block ads anymore, I dont think i'll keep using youtube. I don't expect anything meaningful regarding other people outside non-corporate services anyway.
Kaikki tuommoinen yhtiöiden "yrittäjien" palkkaamis hommat pitäisi kieltää, sehän on suoraa työlainsäädännön kiertämistä. Kun halutaan antaa potkut, lakataan vain "ostamasta" palvelua toiselta.
Even if I wanted to be frozen, there is no point. One would have no guarantees that you wouldn't just be thawed and disposed later so the company can sell more stasis slots. Or if they decide to even try to keep their word, they could maintain your stasis so badly that you would die from that or maybe thaw partially occasionally or something. Unless you are billionaire and could afford somekind of insurance that makes sure nothing happens to you, there would be absolutely nothing protecting you.
And even if everything went according to plan, society could collapse in such way maintaining the stasis could become impossible due to lack of resources.
So they dont want people using remote desktop? What would they even get out of that, just making windows even worse to use. I guess its one less thing to maintain. Well, windows becoming worse is good for linux userbase so this is kind of good news in a way.