rekabis

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (4 children)

Except that,

  1. We have already exceeded the “worst case scenario” path. We are quite literally in uncharted territory, as none of our climate models have been built for this scenario and we have no “prior art” to give any indications of what kind of climate changes might happen next.
  2. On this path, +3℃ will be reached within the next decade and a bit - likely between 2035 and 2038.
  3. At +3℃, lethally high wet bulb temperatures and chaotic weather will take out about 4 billion humans within a few short years. Chaotic weather itself will make industrialized agriculture impossible world-wide, as over 90% of all agriculture is shacked to rainfall. And too much is equally as devastating as not enough.
  4. The collapse of the AMOC - with a “most likely due by” in the 2050s - will supercharge this climate chaos, causing weather patterns worldwide to whiplash for up to a decade as the planetary climate tries to find a “new normal”. At this point, pretty much any agriculture aside from hydroponics - and less than 3% of crops can be successfully worked hydroponically - will simply be unviable.

We are fucked. Right now, the best we can do is limit the wider environmental damage. Entire ecosystems will collapse, as changes are happening too fast for them to migrate towards the poles. The fastest prior example of climate change that we discovered happened almost 100,000× slower, so entire forests had the opportunity to migrate instead of perishing.

I am all for massive action. Not for humanity - I see zero chance of us surviving as any kind of a going concern into the 22nd century - but for the planetary ecosystem. We must give it the best possible chance for recovery, so that whatever comes after us has the best opportunity to flourish.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Trump has already been ignoring the rulings of judges. Successfully, I might add. And without any consequences.

This means that the rule of law is now over, and that the constitution is irrelevant and ultimately unenforceable.

This is always the game plan of fascists: to remove from power anyone in a high enough position who would obey legal processes, such that when true opposition occurs, there is no-one left who will enforce the law. Then they can move out into the open, pull down any part of the law or the legal system that they don’t like, and start doing the truly reprehensible stuff.

It’s why they objected to Obama filling that Supreme Court position that opened up (which he had full legal rights to re-fill), so that they could pack it with a crony that they could control, stacking the Supreme Court in their favour. And just look at how corrupt it has become.

Mark my words, shit is going to get really dark within the next six months to a year. Like, concentration camp dark.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Technically the Earth is not spherical… it’s an oblate spheroid.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

How does this not flagrantly violate the First Amendment?

I mean, besides the fact that Trump has dismembered the rule of law and has rendered the constitution unenforceable and irrelevant - we should still be holding the government to account as much as possible.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Canada might need these sooner rather than later.

With the breakdown of democracy and the rule of law in America, the Constitution just became wholly unenforceable and therefore irrelevant. That means that Trump could make good on his fever dream of invading Canada.

And there are many Americans who would jump at the chance to obey his command to slaughter Canadians. With only 40M against America’s 334M - and 0.097M military personnel against America’s 2.1M - it would be absolutely no contest.

Our only way of making such a fascist act of aggression as painful as possible would be with asymmetrical warfare using tiny, hard-to-defeat drones that could act independently and strike without warning. Deploy 10k of these suckers onto a battlefield, and the only survivors would be those within sealed armour or flying at high altitude. Because even an A10 Warthog loitering low over the field can be taken out if it unexpectedly ingests a half-dozen of the explosive buggers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Canadian phone on a Canadian carrier, freshly updated to iOS 18.3.1. Looks like the correct and proper name is still being used by Apple Maps.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

More corporate welfare. Sweet. Billionaires need their handouts, after all.

Meanwhile, the working class gets shafted harder than ever.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Here I thought the main cliff of collapse would happen between 2050 and 2100, likely with the collapse of the AMOC. I would probably be dead of old age by then.

Silly me.

Worst-case is now projecting close to +3℃ by 2035, which is only a decade away. And at that temp, climate chaos and lethally high wet-bulb temps will take out half of all humanity.

Fffffffuuuuuuck.

And now America has a Science-denying clown in charge for the next half a decade, who is actively destroying democracy to engineer a permanent Republican ascendency.

Ain’t that fun.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

Prioritizing natural gas is risky. Prioritizing nuclear power, not so much.

Even hydroelectric is more risky than nuclear. And in an era of climate change, inconsistent weather can bring inconsistent rainfall. There might come a time when reservoirs simply don’t stay full enough to generate electricity. And yes, while Nuclear power requires water to cool, this water can also be recycled through cooling towers. You don’t need massive bodies of water for nuclear power.

And what hydroelectric, solar, and wind power do, is make electrical systems resilient. Solar power in particular, tends to peak at about the same time that maximum power is needed for air conditioning during the summertime. And the right kind of nuclear reactor can be throttled up and down quite quickly in response to varying demands on the electrical system. If everyone pumping solar power back onto the grid, nuclear power can come to an almost complete standstill in only a matter of minutes. You can’t do that with traditional fossil fuel power plants.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

That is highly illegal in Canada, so no. You should be reported to the government.

It won’t be illegal when the country doesn’t exist anymore.

And if you want to roll over and show your belly to an invading aggressor, I have no problem lumping you in with other fascist collaborators.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 months ago (7 children)

This is also why I am going for my firearms license this year.

And once I have it, an FN-P90 with full-sized magazines. Plus something decently portable and long-range. Because if they cross the border in force - and America has had invasion plans refreshed every decade since WWII - I intend to make their occupation as painful as possible. We’ll definitely lose and be fully occupied - 40M vs 134M is no contest - but asymmetrical warfare can be exceedingly effective against a larger (and arrogant) aggressor.

Who’s with me in getting their license to practice at the range with?

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago

Oh, thank god.

And I say that even as an atheist.

Conservatism is the most bigoted, corrupt, anti-democratic and downright anti-human political system out there. It has only two purposes:

  1. To disenfranchise and impoverish the Working Class
  2. To empower and enrich the Parasite Class
view more: ‹ prev next ›