ram

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Only if you say it was written by an AI, that's the lesson here.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

because since some diffusion generation are deterministic

You are generalizing and using the word "some" at the same time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Linux Hater's Blog was half satire and half honest criticism.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This reminds me of the old linux hater's blog post "At least we don't have any viruses".

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago

With the shit some governments pulled during the first rounds of vaccination you can't blame people for being skeptical.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

If you get caught we've never met.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

Guess it’s time for another FPS hit…

Is it August already? Man, time flies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

It's hard to find a name because nowadays people often use terms like 'bigotry', 'hate speech' and 'bad faith' to refer to anything they don't like so they can shut down discussions.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, but if you then downvoted the post it would still show a score of 10 in B and C instead of 9. This is the first of the two advantages I described. Even worse, if the post received 2 downvotes from ten different instances it would still show a score of 10 or 8 instead of -10.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's already there. Here's yours (use desktop mode if you're on mobile).

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Remember when android phones fitted in hands?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Under his tweet a lot of “verified” (=right wing) accounts plauded this and asked to fight employers who fired employees for having written something homophobic

Any examples of that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›