qx128

joined 2 years ago
[–] qx128@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I really like checking these myself to make sure it’s true. I WAS NOT DISAPPOINTED!

(Total Rs is 8. But the LOGIC ChatGPT pulls out is ……. remarkable!)

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Nothing prevents you from putting a call to “main()” in the global scope

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

If it works, is it really broken? Just add more screws.

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 13 points 4 weeks ago

Honestly, I can’t distinguish the colors

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 80 points 4 weeks ago (8 children)

Sure, important metric. But can you please choose better fucking colors for the graph?

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Unequivocal proof that it’s trained on human behavior

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 47 points 2 months ago

That’s what Xi said.

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

$20 says it’s all AI bots 🥲

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 78 points 4 months ago (3 children)

If their customers are going to have to get used to not owning games they paid for, I guess Ubisoft is going to get used to not having money 🤷🏻

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Commence operation “find out”!

[–] qx128@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

It’s for the extra helpful documentation. You see, in this fantastic example, after the author set GLFW_TRUE to 1, he explained the deep and profound meaning of the value. This exemplifies that the number 1 can also be written as a word: “One”! Some people might be able to figure this out, but the author clearly went above and beyond to make the code accessible to the open source community, encouraging contributions from anyone who’s considering improving the code. Furthermore, this follows the long held tradition of man pages - explaining the nuance of the code, in preparation for telling others to RTFM when they arrogantly ask a question.

view more: next ›