pragmakist

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Until I find the bloody proposal that none of it's detractors seems to dare link to, I'm going to assume that I, as a citizen of EU, has a clear and present interest in not having Mozilla et al using their control of our browsers to block government services.

I can do without my browser suddenly deciding that it doesn't trust the fire department, thank you very much.

(Or the pharmacy, or my doctor, or, or or at lot of things.)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know whether it's true.

I am however confident that you don't know either.

But as for the "slightest" research, riddle me this: Why is there no link to the proposal in the article?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

There are still significant parts of the internet without ads.

Although I'd admit that the gap between the demise of usenet and the birth of the fediverse was tough.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Depending on what they mean by "private" throwing i2p on there instead of ddns might be just the ticket.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Reasonable presentation, not that difficult to follow.

Free

But I would point out that I haven't tried any of that other options to learn AI, so can't really compare.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Maybe check fast.ai out?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Deterrence and prevention are different from post facto responce, and show of force is different from application of force.

Consider what went wrong in Afghanistan, Iraq, Vitenam. Consider how many Indian lives it took to end the Indian wars the hard way. Consider the Black and Tans in Ireland. Consider what happened when the Nazis slaugthered whole villages. Consider the Sovietunion in that war (27 million lost out of a total population of 200 million)

Now find the cases, please, where actually sending the troops in helped in something like this.

And then take note of how limited the deployment were, or how special the circumstances.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

"Israel must respond in a severe heavy-handed way if they are to dissuade any further attacks and keep their people safe"

This newer works!

Simple as that. Look at the evidence, please. This always leads to further violence, and ultimately mass slaugther.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh, by the way, text-only browsers are still a thing.

You might want to look at links and/or lynx and see if they cover your usecase.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's a service.

It's a service given to you for free by a company with no apparant way of generating income.

Would you think about that, please?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

More than 400000 of us for each of those locations then, and how many of us have then bothered to wander in, I wonder?

Anyway, would you really trust an American company to actually make their sandwiches 1ft tall?

How would you even start to eat such a thing?

(Also most standardized feet are around 30 cm, so 12ft is ~ 3.6 m)

view more: ‹ prev next ›