pop
Wikipedia working as intended. It was always influenced by who were good at hiding the truth behind some debatable truth accepted by "western scholars".
Last when I went on a rabbit hole on Wikipedia, there were entries which whitewashed British colonialists invasion as a positive by referencing the history books written by… you guessed it, the British. 🤦♂️
Still going to use the heck out if it. It's super useful in my workflow and firefox at heart. I want to be more productive, not poorductive on some weird purist idealism.
The US government believes its hegemony over global surveillance and propaganda is dying. And it has to ban apps as an act of coping over their failures. They expect their puppet states around the world to follow suit.
FTFY
Honestly, Fvck em' both.
"They took our jerbs"
This is what the dinosaurs did and they got wiped out. 🤦♂️
yep I got downvoted, as expected. More proof. What's a surprise. Just like Reddit
Where have I heard it before? If my memory serves me right, it was very popular cope on another discussion platform. What a surprise. Just like Reddit.
"dOwNvoTeS pROvE mE rIgHt"
did you think you're going to get a hero's welcome?
Here's an idea: Just stop breathing and none of that will happen. 🤦♂️
/s
an authoritarian government that is provably responsible for (multiple?) genocide(s)
Yes, US has a history of it. As a matter of fact, it was built on a genocide of the native population and is currently contributing to one in the middle ea
They didn't but open source enthusiasts hate it when developers even try to imply not wanting their contributions used without attribution, it's basically killing puppies in this community.
They'll only ever use it to make money themselves without anything in return just like the corporations who do the same but then they'll call themselves morally principled for reasons.
que a moron trying to explain why opensource developers should bend to their will about what "opensource" should be for them.