c/shitUSApesSay
Might as well make it like similar to a plantation and make sure they make the minimum then, huh?
pop
joined 5 years ago
The study had some key limitations, which weren’t really reflected in the headlines about its bombastic findings, namely that this analysis has yet to be peer reviewed or published in full (and, as pointed out by the British Heart Federation, includes different numbers in the study summary and press release). The observational study also relied on self-reported dietary information, which may include errors or distortions, and it’s unclear whether the subjects continued time-restricted eating beyond the two days they reported
Why are people posting non peer-reviewed content that's based on self-reporing from a country that has a obesity problem that isn't going to go away by gorging on Mcdonald's in the 4 hour window.
Calling it viral-study is diminishing what scientific study does. Click bait
The early history is absolutely wild, and in Utah they still have tons of money and power and everyone acts like it’s just a normal thing.
Replace Utah with USA, and it's the same thing with a lot of shit.
right? this is just their PR talking.
"Tech youtuber"? this guy just regurgitates whatever is already trending and then adds in his own right wing idiocracy. He's "tech's" reaction video guy.
ikr, targeted social media propaganda. that the US social media companies have pushed and weaponized for two decades. It makes it hard to see the truth.
It only takes 2 trolls to make an argument look unpopular here
I'd rather stay with Reddit where hillbillies come out of woodwork to defend the fatherland with convincing arguments like "America bad", "they hate us because they ain't us", "we're gonna take what we want and there's nothing you can do about it"..
Do us a favor and go back to your "totally not social media propaganda land".
Whattt! People are critical a country that has a history of invading countries at will, killing civilians in mass, is currently funding genocide and evades any responsibility or consequences.
But shh… it's only evil when US says it is. The nuance is, US isn't housing the troops for the host country's benefit, no matter how you want to twist the truth.
didn't read the article. did you?
Cha Ching! 🤑🤑🤑
-USA
ikr? who woulda thought western support for indiscriminate bombing of civilians and land takeover could be start of something much worse? It should have totally gone similar to US invading Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq. Without consequences.
but you think now's the start, huh?
An attempt to generate "being against genocide" rhetoric.