player2

joined 2 years ago
[–] player2 2 points 2 years ago

I think we're all on the same side here but I think that person's analogy is valuable because it demonstrates the disconnect in logic between the perceived value of the "health risks" that are being avoided versus the risks, harm, and morals of permanently modifying someone's body against their will under false pretenses.

[–] player2 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes! Humans literally evolved to have a foreskin so it has to provide an advantage beyond any added risks, even under pre-historic hygiene conditions.

If it truly posed a health risk then that would immediately impact an individual's ability to reproduce and it would have shrunk and disappeared over thousands of years of breeding.

[–] player2 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Earth is currently experiencing a sixth mass extinction - 60 minutes
https://youtu.be/6TqhcZsxrPA

[–] player2 2 points 2 years ago

You just described bicycles. Bicycles do those things.

[–] player2 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's fun to actually have interaction and visibility here. On Reddit my comments were usually permanently buried at the bottom by the time I saw a post.

view more: ‹ prev next ›