peopleproblems

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

About 100m according to others in the regime.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

258,000,000.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

I think they are counting on it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I don't remember quite the theory I'm thinking of, but the point where "physics breaks" always seemed like the various equations became analogous to an identity matrix.

If one can assume that the physics in our universe do not change, and that density does "something", it would sort of make sense that the infinitely dense point is an identity in our universe, but forms new laws of physics in a different universe. The conditions that make the black hole in our universe would prevent it from "bouncing" in our universe. But maybe in this "new" universe, time and space are inverted. Mirrored in time and space. While your first response might be "so time flows backwards in this universe?" that wouldn't be the case from an observer in that universe.

The new universe would also possibly look wildly different - parity of particles could then be swapped, or possibly the charge-parity violation itself. Then in this universe an observer would witness an abundance of anti-matter, and if pions exist, they may have positive parity.

It would also mean that black holes could still form in this other universe, and given rise to new universes with our system of physics.

Now the problem with this is testing it. But it gives some cool questions, like, can we interact with these universes? Presumably, the ones opposite ours, absolutely not. We'd annihilate upon doing so. But the other ones? That becomes a fun idea.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 day ago

Man these guys keeping their shit together while ICE cower behind masks, guns and armor is down right impressive.

They want violence so fucking bad. Blocking their vehicles, overwhelming their arrests, preventing their ability to shelter comfortably? They will either snap and massacre or gradually just get unmotivated to keep trying it.

I couldn't do this. In the one video, when I heard one of the agents arm their weapon my own fight or flight activated, and that adrenaline pumped hard. Logically, it sort of makes sense. If they're going to start shooting, I'm not going to make it to a safe spot. If I can't run then it's fight.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

Ok but from my really screwed up factory, I purged a giant area around the main factory. So now I need a way to defend all those areas eventually.

I think the only way that's gonna work is going to be train-to-pilpeline at some natural choke points as I start setting up an actual defense perimiter. As I don't imagine my ring of mines is actually going to do much should it come to it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 6 days ago

Spain? Read the room.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I believe it was canonized that Vader made improvements when it was required. Vader was still a technical genius and a pilot that no one rivaled.

Take his right hand for instance - he was given the first prosthetic, that he replaced during the clone wars. One of his legs in a comic gets beat to all hell, and he rips off a jedi training droid leg to replace it, which works better and is far sturdier.

But originally it was intended to be a hinderance. Anikin was a walking vergence in the force, simply by existing he made his connection to the force stronger. By sticking him in a much less technically advanced cyborg suit than what Grievous got, he could also just blast him with some lightning to weaken him physically again.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

Why stop at Gaza right? Israel has a lot of neighbors, might as well walk right into Iran or Lebanon and just start murdering people too!

The tell tale sign of how awful the zionists are is that they aren't picking a fight with Iran. Syria fell. Syria is starting to rebuild. Palestinians had barely any organized resistance. They only fight those who can't fight back. Almost exactly like another genocidal maniac in the 1920s-1940s.

[–] [email protected] 82 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This feels like an attempt to destroy open source projects. Overwhelm developers with crap PRs so they can't fix real issues.

It won't work long term, because I can't imagine anyone staying on GitHub after it gets bad.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago

Computer Engineer here, studied QED and E&M.

This is the most accurate answer

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He even has his own theme song!

 
 
 
 

I didn't care for the musical nature of it. That aside:

The first 'Joker' clearly established that the main character was Arthur Fleck. Clearly suffering from mental illness as a result of abuse growing up, and the people he murdered were abusing him in some way. To me, as a long time Batman fan, this 'Joker' was anything but Joker.

  1. He didn't take pleasure in chaos.
  2. He wasn't anti-batman in anyway.
  3. A clear back story that lined up with his behaviors.
  4. Clearly a dude pushed too far (kind of like Killing Joke, but it didn't line up with that character's style).

However, when he was in the 'Joker' role, he became clear headed and focused. So now the 'Joker' clearly isn't Joker but the beginning of Joker?

In Folie A Deux, we see him continue to be abused, still having strange fantasies, a system failing around him, and noticably the 'Joker' character is resonating with people fed up with all sorts of bullshit. The collective desire to burn it down and restart - very common theme within the Batman comics and joker. We see Harley Quinzel introduced, and as we discover throughout the movie - this is the actual Harley Quinn Psychiatry, brilliance, obsessed with Joker to the point that when Arthur says it was just something he made up to do what he thought he needed, she quit him. The last parts of the movie tie is completely together. Ricky, who is killed by the only guard that is sometimes nice, breaks Arthur, realizing murder happens to those undeserving by those who 'shouldnt' be doing it.

Joker escapes after the court room explosion (with a burned Harvey Dent, that was badass). He's rescued by enthusiasts, who he escapes from. He encounters Quinn and she says that his "fantasy was all that mattered, and it's gone."

When the Joker is murdered at the end by the psychopath, he starts it with a retelling of the joke Arthur told Murray. Albeit, one that was significantly better delivered. He also notably uses a knife, and is laughing the whole time, and gives himself a scarred smile. This man, (if Warner Bros could ever finish a good DC series) would likely continue to be an evolution of 'Joker'.

This all works because:

  1. Joker rarely has a back story, and famously is stated to prefer his origin to be "Multiple Choice."
  2. Several comics and media (Notably the Arkham series of video games) explore how Joker is not confined to a single person. Unlike Batman who has very specic goals, values, and traumatic origin, Joker is a shared 'idea' between these individuals that reject the value of civilization at all.
  3. Harley Quinzel was only introduced in the 90s, but her main obsession with Joker evolved over time as he abused her, or burned things she learned to care for, but seemingly remained obsessed because of some 'fantasy' she provided him, UNTIL he broke that fantasy and she quit him abruptly just like in the movie.

I don't think it was a great movie. But it actually reimagined the same Joker story in a new way that I did thoroughly enjoy. And it left it plenty open for more stories from it, just as all good DC stories do.

 

This is what I do for work I guess

 
 

It will still break them if you try it

 
 

I'm talking like one person brought in all the money for a decade, then a divorce happens. Some of it makes sense - a house with mortgage, one spouse buys the other out of the house. Which is great, but if one spouse doesn't have the income to take a loan out to buy the other, does that mean that the spouse who does have the income has the choice to buy out or sell?

Similarly, things like 401ks and pensions I imagine you can't just take out half the cash in them and give that to their spouse. Or does that have to be a loan for the amounts in those plans?

Is it debt all the way down for both?

 
 

Let me set the stage: Newly single dad of a young kid. After COVID-19 I haven't done much outside of my home and taking care of my kid. I work full time-remote, and between the kiddo and leaving room for a hobby or taking care of the house, it seems like the only other thing I have time for is sleep.

The thing I know is that this is likely an issue with my anxiety and anxious attachment. The conclusion we've arrived at in therapy is that I gotta meet people. I apparently forgot, or don't know how to do that. Where to meet people. It's not a big city, but 200k-300k people in the county.

Maybe I'm looking for something of a strategy more than anything.

edit: thank you guys, I really appreciate it!

 
view more: next ›