pbpza

joined 2 years ago
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/18399880

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/18399878

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/18399875

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17910175

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17910073

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8363072

Leftwing activism of recent decades exhibits an anarchist turn evident in quantitative indicators like mentions of anarchists in news reports and by activists adopting anarchist modes of organization, tactics, and social goals-whether or not they claim that label. The authors of this Element argue that the very crises that generated radical mobilizations since the turn of the millennium have both led activists to reject other strategies for social transformation and to see anarchist practices as appropriate to the challenges of our time. This turn is clearly apparent in the Americas and Europe, and has reverberations on an even broader transnational, perhaps global, scale. This suggests the need for research on social movements to consider anarchists and other marginalized radical traditions more fully, not just as objects of study, but as important sources of theory.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17910175

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/17910073

cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/8363072

Leftwing activism of recent decades exhibits an anarchist turn evident in quantitative indicators like mentions of anarchists in news reports and by activists adopting anarchist modes of organization, tactics, and social goals-whether or not they claim that label. The authors of this Element argue that the very crises that generated radical mobilizations since the turn of the millennium have both led activists to reject other strategies for social transformation and to see anarchist practices as appropriate to the challenges of our time. This turn is clearly apparent in the Americas and Europe, and has reverberations on an even broader transnational, perhaps global, scale. This suggests the need for research on social movements to consider anarchists and other marginalized radical traditions more fully, not just as objects of study, but as important sources of theory.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/18380435

cross-posted from: https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/959553

At least six people lock themselves in Grade II-listed York and Albany next to Regent’s Park and post notice

Squatters have taken over a pub in London leased by Gordon Ramsay that is up for sale with a guide price of £13m.

A group of at least six people locked themselves inside the Grade II-listed York and Albany hotel and gastropub, next to Regent’s Park, boarding up the windows and putting up a “legal warning” defending their takeover, the Sun reported.

In photographs taken before the windows were further boarded up, a person could be seen sleeping on a sofa in the bar, surrounded by litter.

On Saturday morning, two masked people wearing black tracksuits and carrying backpacks and carrier bags exited the property, running away from reporters before they could be approached for comment.

A notice taped to a door said the group had a right to occupy the venue, which they said was not a “residential building” and was therefore not subject to 2012 legislation in England and Wales that made squatting in a residential building a criminal offence.

The piece of paper, signed by “the occupiers”, also said: “Take notice that we occupy this property and at all times there is at least one person in occupation.

“That any entry or attempt to enter into these premises without our permission is therefore a criminal offence as any one of us who is in physical possession is opposed to such entry without our permission.

“That if you attempt to enter by violence or by threatening violence we will prosecute you. You may receive a sentence of up to six months’ imprisonment and/or a fine of up to £5,000.

“That if you want to get us out you will have to issue a claim for possession in the county court or in the high court.”

Ramsay called the police on Wednesday but was unable to have the people removed, it is understood.

Another notice asked passersby for “food and clothes donations or anything else you no longer want or need”.

The occupation of a person’s non-residential property without their permission is not a crime in England, though police can take action if crimes are subsequently committed, including damaging the property or stealing from it.

The Metropolitan police said in a statement: “Police were made aware of squatters at a disused property in Parkway, Regent’s Park, NW1 on Wednesday 10 April. This is a civil matter and so police did not attend the property.”

In 2007, the film director Gary Love bought the freehold of the former 19th-century coaching inn.

He subsequently leased the property to Ramsay on a 25-year term with an annual rent of £640,000.

The Kitchen Nightmares host unsuccessfully attempted to free himself from the lease in a legal battle at the high court in 2015.

The venue went on sale at the end of last year with a guide price of £13m.

According to government guidance, squatters can apply to become the registered owners of a property if they have occupied it continuously for 10 years, acted as owners for the whole of that time and had not previously been given permission to live there by the owner.

[–] pbpza 1 points 2 years ago

Samo to, że ta propaganda tu jest pomimo bardzo negatywnego odzewu śwaiadczy o tym, że głosowanie nic nie zmienia ;)

[–] pbpza 3 points 2 years ago

Do you have to hop the gate without touching the gate? Can you for example put your foot on the gate to make it easier?

[–] pbpza 2 points 2 years ago

I don't know if you can write it, but what are the tricks to not get caught?

[–] pbpza 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Anyone actually does shit like that in public? What about hypothetical guards?

[–] pbpza 1 points 2 years ago

Sens ma i dbać o "bańkę" by była lepiej wyedukowana i poinformowana i robić outreach na zewnątrz by zdobywać nowych ludzi z innych przestrzeni, tego drugiego anarhciści za mało robią, powinno wchodzić w nie swoje przestrzenie online i tam jakoś agitować za anarczhizmem, linkując do adekwatnych materiałów jak ktoś wyrazi większe zainteresowanie ideologią. To propaguje potem na cały świat, bo te osoby będą przyciągać nowe osoby ze swojego środowiska, ale wymaga wysiłku by nie zamknąć się w bańce - niestety de facto wielu anarchistów zamyka sie w swoich bańkach i tworzą bardzo sekciarskie społeczności.

[–] pbpza 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Warto agitować za anarchizmem online bo potem to się przekłada na więcej osobów działających w terenie, dzięki czemu zazwyczaj łatwiej jest coś osiągnąć. Warto tego nie ignorować, liczby też mają znaczenie i dzięki obecności w interencie możemy bardziej efektywnie zbierać ludzi do naszych projektów.

[–] pbpza 1 points 2 years ago

It seems like we indeed agree here. Assumption of bad intentions happens, maybe indeed a bit too much in leftist circles given our goals unfortunately but I understand.

[–] pbpza 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

A mocno się nie zgodzę, zauważ jak zwiększyło się zainteresowanie lewicą jak postwały ładne kanały breadtubowe, po prostu prawica wcześniej zaczęła robić atrakcyjne materiały to i wypłynęła na interenecie, ale jak widać kontra lewicowa jak najbardziej działa i zmienia wiele przestrzeni. Na reddicie masz całkiem sporo progresywizmu społecznego i krytyki korporacji, czemu co prawda daleko do radykalizmu pokroju anarchizmu ale przynajmniej jest tendencją w dobrą stronę i jak najbardziej można na tym coś budować. Powinniśmi i agitować na platformach molochów i rozwijać własną infrastrukturę jak fediverse.

[–] pbpza 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Do you mean the negative reaction to the post as astroturfing or the content of the essay? If the former then indeed I can agree, I don't understand the negative reaction to this post given what is actual content of the essay - that it's easy to fall into a trap of spending too much time on electoral politics instead of organizing in the real world and that in first past the post voting systems only elections where possible results of elections are not certain (it's hard to predict the winner) actually matter, which is a thesis with some merit I would say.

[–] pbpza 1 points 2 years ago

He suggest too that voting in actual swing state can matter, while if you are in a state ruled by some party there your vote doesn't matter in the first past the post system.

[–] pbpza 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

You should prioritize organizing in the real world, Anark mostly argues that it's easy to fall into the trap of caring too much about electoral politics, which is a mistake given how much is that game rigged in favor of the privileged. Unfortunate that people downvote instead of first listening to the essay's content, shows that unfortunately dogmatism is quite prevalent among anarchists, which I would say is one of the reasons of why the ideology was not more successful historically. If we cannot have a healthy conflict among ourselves, how can we organize to fight actual authoritarians who will want to oppress us as much as we let them?

[–] pbpza 16 points 2 years ago

Yeah, like I am voting to not give fascists slots in the system without the fight, but the truth is that direct organizing is much better to change the system and you can easily fall into the trap of caring too much about electoral politics.

view more: ‹ prev next ›