owf

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I haven't touched the thing in three years.

I just remember that it had pace where it should have average speed. That is all.

Now go away. I'm not interested in defending myself to someone like you, who's been nothing but nasty.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

A 2022 Toyota Corolla gets around 40mpg highway and squeezes 5 people inside so it uses 0.5 gallons per person per 100mi.

5 people in the Corolla is 2–3 times as many people as are at all likely to be in there. That's a very skewed number.

When using realistic numbers, cars come in at about the same per mile as large commercial airliners. (Flights tend to be far, far longer of course.)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Vor allem, 25 km/h sind auch nicht gerade viel für einen Radfahrer ohne Motor. Geht's bergab, dann wäre der S-Pedelec-Fahrer mit seinen 25 km/h der Langsame.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Sowas ist ein Velomobil.

Fähnchen haben die meisten Liegeräder. Übersehen wird man trotzdem oft :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ich hatte son Ding (aber Dreirad also noch tiefer).

Du wirst auch gerne übersehen (auch mit Fahne) und es kam mir immer besonders beängstigend vor, da du von so einem Rad nicht springen kannst wie von einem Gewöhnlichen. Du siehst auch wenig im Vergleich, da du natürlich auf einem Liegerad nicht über Autos sehen kannst.

Dafür hatte das Ding tatsächlich eingebaute Vorfahrt. Wenn du doch gesehen wirst, halten die Leute gerne an, um zu glotzen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That's not the Vivoactive cycling app.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Nah you’re right and this person has obviously never used a Garmin.

You mean that you didn't bother to read my comment properly before personally attacking me. Let me guess, you're from Reddit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

I only cycle, so I couldn't comment on the other apps.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They were Vivoactives. They had pace, not average speed.

Regardless of what the focus of the watch is, the cycling app should show cycling stats.

It's incredibly low effort to get something so basic wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I said average speed. Learn to read.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Apple Watch.

I had a couple of Garmins before and the difference is night and day. The Apple Watch isn't perfect, but it's clear that a lot of thought went into it.

The Garmins on the other hand, were lowest of low effort.

They blatantly didn't talk to even a single cyclists while building their cycling app.

Cyclists use average speed, not pace. Even the junkiest $3 cycle computer from Ali Baba gets this right, but not Garmin. They just copy-pasted the running screen.

view more: ‹ prev next ›