Just don't build a house of neutron-reflective tungsten carbine bricks around it or cowboy the beryllium hemispheres, hell, maybe just trust the last guys' calculations instead of testing for closeness to criticality. Safe as houses.
nymwit
joined 2 years ago
Now that's a name I haven't heard in a long time. A long time.
I get that this was written to be like, "dish soap OMG!" But there is nothing in here explaining why that might be wrong or dangerous. Why not a sentence like, "instead X lubricant should have been used because Y according to Boeing"? Underground water and sewer pipes that fit together and continuously withstand a larger pressure differential than the aircraft portals in planes use "pipe soap" to help fit the bell and spigot together. If it's wrong, tell us why! I thought the bolts were found to be the reason it failed anyway. Even if "Boeing assembly instructions thought to be insufficient by workers" is the main message, that doesn't grab the clicks though, huh? I'm expecting too much from a business insider article I guess. [Inebriated internet grumbling]
Psssh, a real stalk on the column? My 8000BLOZ is all graphical captcha controls.
Gotta read past the headline folks, it's at best implying something it isn't and at worst, rage bait.
You've got my head spinning "Government bans smaller government's decision to restrict smaller government's own flag speech"
Did you see this is a ban for the City to fly the flag on City property? Sure, shitty, and the reasons behind it are shitty but I don't see how it's a first amendment deal.
Wait, you're telling me my favorite brand doesn't actually support LGBT stuff? They're only in it for the money? Whaaa?
“We disagree with the Court’s opinion that employers can require employees to be taught — as a condition of employment — that one race is morally superior to another race. The First Amendment protects no such thing, and the State of Florida should have every right to protect Floridians from racially hostile workplaces. We are reviewing all options on appeal going forward.”
I have an extremely low opinion of intelligence of the "anti-woke" warriors but, like, do people really think that's what's happening? They're honestly thinking DEI stuff is teaching that one race is "morally superior" to another? That's just a wild fucking line to throw in there.
thanks for the additional information!
Cedrick Frazier is in on it, too. For some reason he rates a picture while Bonnie Westlin doesn't. Presumably because of the comparisons the article/general press is making with these laws/Floyd and that Frazier is black. Saying anything about him being black in the article would be crass, but they'll just drop a picture and not have to write anything. "Ooooh look, he must be a hypocrite!" I mean he kinda sorta is maybe, but not because he's black but because the article says he was a champion of police reform after Floyd's murder and now is walking back a reform.
The money is supposed to go to training. Seems reasonable enough. They have a "Captain of Investigations Tanya Harmoning" going on in there about how the cops only know how to do things one way. Seems like it could be good if they learned a different way. There is a little more detail, too: "But even without a ban on prone restraints, he said that state law would continue to prohibit school-based officers from pinning students to the ground in ways that restrict breathing."
Was it just that he was being held in a prone position or was it perhaps complicated/exacerbated by you know, the cop kneeling on his neck? I mean surely that was the main contributing factor to Floyd's death at the cops' hands, wasn't it? Not just that he was being held on the ground? This long article seems to avoid any details while using the comparison to amp its message.
Would that mean that if something was not continually growing in value you'd end up paying the value of it in taxes over some amount of years? Does this encourage people to pay the tax value out of the asset or just divest from non appreciating assets? If you paid taxes from the value of the asset I guess it'd be like a series converging to zero over time? Like 6% of 100 is 6, the 6% of 94 is 5.64, 6% of 88.36, vs. paying 6 bucks every year. Slower but sort of an eroding effect - like paying society's subscription fee for how you got the value in the first place!