naevaTheRat

joined 2 years ago
[–] naevaTheRat 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There's actually a really good method of analysis that is highly predictive about the actions of classes of people politically.

[–] naevaTheRat 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh thank you! That's so thoughtful.

I tried it myself and while it worked super well the bottom ended up looking strange but everything was wonderful once inverted.

Mentioning bar tending was useful, as it lead me to how you can use sugar content to adjust relative densities to get the effect you want.

[–] naevaTheRat 22 points 1 month ago

Personally I prefer clankerwankers but whatever works.

I also think slopmachine is a good slur for llms, given it highlights the gambling aspect and addictive potential.

[–] naevaTheRat 1 points 1 month ago

But... you didn't take a look at the report and were talking about the most anodyne interpretation when they

a) explain why 18 b) explain the scope c) break down the kinds of attraction by age group d) break down the kinds of offences

Asking if you looked at the report and what you thought about one of the most shocking things is completely reasonable.

[–] naevaTheRat 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Why did you have to be so rude and smug earlier? you hadn't read that part of the report so you didn't have a good reason to assume I was making shit up.

I copied the title of the authors in that piece, I don't want to inflame people, I wanted a discussion of something I found extraordinarily shocking.

[–] naevaTheRat 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Would have sexual contact with a child younger than 10 years if no one would find out (4.0%)

page 12, midwit.

[–] naevaTheRat 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It happened the other way because the vast amount (97%) of convicted offenders are men, and that expert consensus is men are vastly more likely to offend. People have limited time and money, so research is funded when it is able to clearly state its impact.

I wish we had infinite resources in the academy, but we do not.

[–] naevaTheRat 1 points 1 month ago

There are many requirements in the police training manual. For instance anyone being searched at all is meant to be taken somewhere private and their dignity preserved. I assume most people have seen this not happen.

Same gender is one such requirement.

[–] naevaTheRat 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

At least one Australian expert says between 3% as likely as men to 25% as likely as men to offend. See below.

You can just look stuff up you know.


Joe Sullivan has spent 26 years counselling child sex offenders in the United Kingdom and is visiting Australia to attend an international police conference at Bond University on the Gold Coast.

While experts agree the majority of paedophiles are men, Dr Sullivan says women are responsible for more offences than previously thought.

"What I can say for certain is that it's way more prevalent than people fully appreciate or understand," he told the ABC.

"There's some research to suggest it could be as high as 25 per cent.

"However, when you look at the representation within the criminal justice system it could be as low as 3 to 4 per cent of overall convictions."

source: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-04-28/female-paedophiles-prevalent-says-leading-forensic-psychologist/6428710

[–] naevaTheRat -4 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] naevaTheRat 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well it's hard to say. Their sampling is pretty good, although mostly reflects the white population here as they discuss.

We don't really have better stats than self reports, and this is a good study of self reports. You could dive into the data to see exactly what are the major areas, they indicate it's CP, CP when also a child, sexual chats online mostly. With about 3% assault or worse.

Keep in mind it's not uniform, the wierdos and freaks are amusingly less likely to. It's more likely to be the well dressed guy with a family. So social elites. Depending on your crowd you might be pretty unlikely to know someone who does this.

[–] naevaTheRat 3 points 1 month ago

"Happy animals just taste better. It's science"

Me at 13 years old in agricultural class watching the conveyor belt of terrified chickens hung by their feet go by: 🥹

view more: ‹ prev next ›