mrbn

Evel Knievel movies. Although I did really like the series.

Canada has a lot to offer and to gain from being part of the Eurostack initiative.

I think The Conversation just wrapped news about Eurostack in Canada wrapping paper to get views.

Canada can't be a part of Eurostack; its goal is bring everything (tech) in-house. Aside investing capital so Eurostack can hit its lofty 300 billion euro goal in 10 years, I dont see what Canada can offer or gain from this. If the "gain" is that we stop Canadian dependence on US tech, we'd just be swapping one overlord for another.

Yes, of course we could reduce our dependence on US tech, but Canada should be stealing this page from Europe's playbook and making their own ~~Euro~~ Canstack

Well, I hope they have insurance.

Thanks, I'll see myself out.

According to the alleged recipients themselves,

I don't see these people, especially after the context in the video, as reliable sources. I remain skeptical about these calls. Don't get me wrong, PP sucks, but Rachel should have done a little more "fact-checking"

Do you think Carney will allow Germany to trade theirs for draft picks later?

Sure, tu peux ajouter un thème qui parraît comme windows, mais pense pas que les applis (existantes comme photoshop, word, etc, ou plus important, custom) que tout les employé(e)s sont accoutumé d'utilisers peuvent être remplacés sans frictions.

Y faux pas ignorer qu'il y a une grosse infrastructure derrières c'est systèmes là.. ADFS, Sharepoint (probably), Office365, etc.

Mon point est que c'est irréaliste de penser que ça ce fais du jour au lendemain peux importe de ce que tu pense de MS.

Je comprends ce que tu dis, mais le coût d'une migration de Windows vers un autre système d'opération comme macOS ou Linux coûterait probablement des milliards. Et si tout cela était fait d'un seul coup, la STM serait probablement paralysée pendant des mois, sinon des années.

Il faudrait procéder de manière itérative et la dernière chose à changer serait le 'day to day' des employées..

Sounds like they need a camera to watch the camera so they can catch the guy.

"gonna paint our wagon, gonna paint it red!" I sing this part to myself frequently.

If you are looking to do something like Github's Personal Access Tokens (PAT) then it is easiest to just think about it like a password:

• Create a high entropy (secure) string
• Store the hash of the string in a database table
• Store the permissions and other metadata with the PAT's hash
• Validate the PAT (permissions, revoke status, etc) on each request to the server

Storing the hash of the token, like you do with passwords, is a good practice in case your db is ever compromised as it wont leave the tokens accessible and reusable without a lot of effort.

Yeah, unfortunately that stuff is almost impossible to estimate. Inform your client that fixing the build will be a game of whack-a-mole where you'll fix one thing and 5 new errors will show up. I would give yourself lots of time since you've never worked on Maui (? You didn't say that in your post but if you've never heard of xamarin, i'll assume maui is new).

I would break your work down into two milestones: a) compile and run, b) fix all the busted views. It should come to no surprise that a) will be hard to estimate so give yourself lots of time, and b) will be easier to estimate because you'll be able to review each View and determine what kind of fixes you need to make.

Good luck

Yes. The transition from Xamarin to Maui has been similar to transition from .net framework to .net core.

A few things you will run into:

• namespaces have changed
• certain things will be deprecated but still currently work (ie FillAndExpand)
• platform specific setup has changed (you'll need to convert to the new way, but code will likely remain the same)
• upgrade your nuget packages to the Maui equivalents (the ones we used had Maui versions so we didn't have to change any of them)
• certain ways of doing things have change slightly, like how to run things on the main UI thread (you'll see warnings)
• your xaml code will remain mostly unchanged but your layout may need to be fixed (especially if your dependencies changed their interfaces)

That's all I can think of right now. There's no easy way to do it and it's going to suck. Focus on getting it to build with all your dependencies upgraded and then go from there.