moonmeow

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

for work purposes, ok fine. but personal purposes i'd try and steer clear as much as i can.

My general point is we should use alternatives whenever possible to discourage this kind of centralized power developing in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

it will truly be messed up if essential websites block user access because of this

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 years ago

For sure, I agree and it's bad. But frankly unsurprising. This is the trajectory of the internet: greater control.

We've become too dependent on centralized tech companies and erred in allowing tech companies to change, define, and control the internet in the first place.

Alternatives must be promoted in mass scale.

[–] [email protected] 53 points 2 years ago (25 children)

hey everyone a friendly reminder that alternatives exist, and just drop this shit fast and move to better alternatives. In this case firefox.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago

why are people indulging this company after all they did?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

well, i guess some silver lining is that threads is basically non-existent after its launch. The serious and place to be instances will block threads. If i need to go see something on threads i'll join an instance that allows it, but doubt i'd ever bother.

Didn't even bother checking it out.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 years ago (6 children)

ya, using the internet without an adblocker is a security risk because Google enables scams across its services.

How about they learn to clean house first before shitting on the internet lol.

incompetent company will do incompetent things.

[–] [email protected] 63 points 2 years ago (11 children)

good stuff, glad to see this opposition.

Also slightly related, but I'd absolutely hate if I were an employee having to work on this project and having my name attached to this. Quite embarrassing for all those involved.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 years ago (4 children)

At this point where he is basically stripping the site of its users (paid + limits) and branding (removing the twitter bird) why didn't he just start up his own social media site and slow grow it instead of wasting money to pillage the competitor and then strip it of everything that made it what it was, i.e., the user base and the brand recognition?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

curious what the result of this case was, quick search didn't come with any updates.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

it feels much more fresh and spacious

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

i just searched and it looks like there's already one on an instance

view more: ‹ prev next ›