money_loo

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

I love the art style of the psp versions so I have settled into that one. So far it’s way more narrative than part 1 and I’m enjoying that a lot more.

I’ve convinced myself to think of the leveling system as more of an elder scrolls game and that’s helped me like it a lot more than I would have otherwise, going in expecting a traditional rpg style system.

I like it a lot so far!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I’m working on it!

Started playing all the games I missed growing up that I really wanted to play, in chronological order.

Just beat the psp version of Final Fantasy. Next up I’m trying to decide if I should play the pixel remaster for part II, or just the psp version of that one, too.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They can’t even get a console to market anymore, why are they branching off to handhelds lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Damn bro. What happened?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Oh fuck, I should learn to finish sentences, I’m not sure I can blame this one on my unregulated adhd lmao

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anything Final Fantasy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

While likely true nothing is making you give them money to enjoy it.

I’ve been playing off and on since it came out and have never given them a damn cent, and have really enjoyed it.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

During Thursday’s speech, Biden deviated from his prepared remarks, skipping over the word “abortion” and instead using the phrases “reproductive freedom” or “freedom to choose.”

Yes, he is catholic. Yes, most Catholics disagree with abortion. No, Biden doesn’t think his religious beliefs should dictate how women live their lives. He literally says it plain as day for even the very stupid among us to understand. Good luck!

https://apnews.com/article/abortion-biden-2024-reproductive-rights-harris-494af752992ba88fa6e3d53fbd54f716

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I made my comment 2 minutes before yours so it’s wild to me that you read the real reason and still threw a fit with that wall of text. Y’all just live on outrage, huh?

This dude owns way more than just a few Panera bread and he was literally just trying to follow the law and even so he decided to go ahead and pay them anyways even though according to the lawyers, he probably could have gotten away with it but you’re right bOtH SiDeS ArE tHE sAmE

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That is unfortunate. Absolute red meat for both-sides-are-bad politics.

Only if you really want it to be.

The real reason was because the law was specifically tailored for fast food, so to protect bakeries and other places it had the clause about the bread.

The law defines what a fast-food restaurant is, and says it is not an establishment that “operates a bakery that produces for sale on the establishment’s premises bread."

The donor was just confused if that meant him, ultimately he decided it probably did but that he’d pay them anyways.

But yeah this is totally the same thing as trump being friendly with Russia.

 
 
view more: next ›