There's an entire UN agreement about traffic signaling.
Round signals with a red border communicate requirements, but without crossing the banana, it's a requirement to eat it.
Blue signals do not communicate information, not requirements.
There's an entire UN agreement about traffic signaling.
Round signals with a red border communicate requirements, but without crossing the banana, it's a requirement to eat it.
Blue signals do not communicate information, not requirements.
You can easily go and sail the high seas.
Just the fact that they used constants in a market-changing action shows they have no idea what the equation even means.
(OMG, the abstract on the first reference already says constants are useless to understand the market, without changing anything!)
They are the same picture...
I literally dont understand what they are doing.
Lol. Did you still expect to?
Anyway, they clearly have no idea what they are doing. Absolutely no idea. But this one seems to be calculated by an academic that used an impersonal objective formula that he expects to zero the trade deficit.
Somehow, it's one of the economists that don't know that tariffs don't have a direct impact on the total trade deficit. Probably, an "economist", but I didn't check.
Certainly was plainly legible on a computer screen in a darkish room...
Some hugely detailed and really certain knowledge from neurology...
Not officially, no.
But yes, it's already here.
Helping with cost of living, housing, health care and education isn't socially progressive?
What kind of society do you live on?
Friends don't let friends mix Nvidia and Linux.
Well, at that point O'Brian still didn't have suffered through it.