Higher heat also means more violent collisions. It would be much harder to collide nucleus by just pressing it. But yeah maybe with even more pressure it might happen but nuclear reactions usually happen with high speed collisions.
When electrons are bound to nucleus, it may prevent collision by having an additional layer causing degeneracy pressure between two colliding nucleus. That won't happen if electrons are unbounded to nucleus. Atleast that's what i imagine
Even if you assume any frame is valid, you have to pick inertial frames. So even if you travel few days, you will be off from earths orbit into space since earth is in circular motion which is acceletared
For a geometric center you would need a boundary of the universe
Tine machine probably moved in its own inertial reference frame. That will actually get you lost in space because the inertial frame does not orbit around, which involves rotation(rotation is intrinsically non-inertial, i.e accelerating). Time machine's frame will be moving in a straight line if its inertial
Earth frame isn't inertial
Well how is MIT more worse than BSD? Both allows prorpietary right?
I guess to overcome electron degeneracy pressure. Nucleus would collide more easily when electrons are stripped away. Not sure if i am conpletely true though
Its harder but its necessary i guess. For ionisation
That's what einstein said. There is no fixed reference frame, but only relative ones. Every "inertial"(meaning, motion without any external force) frame of reference is equally valid as any other inertial frame movibg with respect to it.
But for sure we can tell earth's orbit is not inertial since circular motion occur, which is due to external force of gravity.
Edit:typo
It may use less aluminum, as the top and bottom surfaces are much thicker
I am worried about 2000ms ping
Error: url1 and url2 are the same