ah, apparently there's an activity popular in the ea circles that is called “fiscal sponsoring” which deals with such unpleasantness. (in the meantime there's a question in the comments about puerto rico minimum wage compliance that's – by pure omission – left without any reply whatsoever)
mawhrin
joined 2 years ago
i love that no-one of the lw commenters seemed to check the irs non-profit database.
and your bad name is well deserved for many better reasons too!
i have not enough energy to check if that was mentioned before, but anyways it's a good reminder: the whole cozy enterprise is, indeed, not a registered tax-exempt organisation, and none of the threee nonlinears returned by the irs search engine does seem to have anything in common with the nonlinear dot org.
it's not for the first time this whole ea movement sounds like they're scientologist wannabees either.
yeah, she's like a bloody walking negation sign for any statement
i wonder if they realise how thick with internal jargon their language is, and how highly ritualised.
most of the variance in the genome is linear in nature, by which I mean the effect of a gene doesn’t usually depend on which other genes are present
that person seems homeschooled on absolute bullshit; basic high school biology course thirty-odd years ago was saying otherwise.
the newag's narrative is generally bull; and the folks from the dragon sector do have legal representation.
also reverse engineering with the goal to make things interoperable is explicitly allowed by polish author's law (we do follow the continental copyright conventions in poland, so it's not entirely the same as what the common law countries understand as copyright)
actively investing in shell and actively investing in crypto is unethical and it's not wrong to point it out, and neither is this moral panic; if you don't want to be subjected to ethical assessment, don't brag about potentially unethical behaviour.