macji

joined 2 years ago
[–] macji@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

You're getting downvoted, but as a woman I have been and have seen other women hemmed in by creepy men for sitting in the window seat. I'd rather be rude than at risk.

[–] macji@pawb.social 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I sent this to my girlfriend, then when she flipped it over I flashed my titties at her.

[–] macji@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago

These bunnies are all so incredibly cute!! Thank you for this amazimg art it always brightens my day to see them :))

[–] macji@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's almost like the legal system is made to be obscure and obtuse by design. Difficult to know what's going on there as a lay person.

[–] macji@pawb.social 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They are appealing temporary restraining orders, which are not legally appealeable! TROs are extreme methods of relief designed to stop something from occurring that has a huge risk of irreparable harm, and are temporary so that the court can actually take the time to weigh the issue.

Usually a TRO is issued for 2-3 weeks, the court takes that time to come to grips with what's happening, and then can rule with a better understanding. If you could just appeal a TRO, then you could just take the action that causes the irreparable harm faster than any court can effectively rule, which is why they're not supposed to be appealeable.

So yes, appealing a TRO is dystopian and illegal, but who can stop it? The supreme court eventually...

[–] macji@pawb.social 17 points 3 months ago

Because teenagers are dependants and the parents are responsible for their wellbeing. Since humans wish to and need to reproduce, society has ultimately decided (for better or worse) that the best way to protect everyone is to make children the responsibility of their parents until they are adults. The adults made the decision to have a child, and so that child is their responsibility until they child can be responsible for themselves.

[–] macji@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

Well, as you noticed a lot has changed since Debian in the 90s. While Manjaro has a lot of problems, and while I've found I need to reinstall it every 6 months or so because I'm not very l33t, it's still honestly very easy and very straightforward, and definitely better than Arch if you don't know what you're doing.

If you approach Manjaro with a plan for regularly backing up your data, you can reinstall it with ease whenever you need to, and the reinstallation will be fast and easy. It works out of the box with Steam, and it doesn't ask you to pay close attention to it's backend while not having the problems you noticed with Ubuntu, and best of all it's free and it's not Windows. I run Manjaro and I'm pretty happy with it overall, when though I'm sure I'd be better served with Arch if I ever took the time to really figure it out properly. Good luck, I hope whatever you pick works out well for you.

[–] macji@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What distribution did you try to use? Some of them are steeper to learn than others.

[–] macji@pawb.social 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks for always watching out for me Satan!

 
[–] macji@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago

Couldn't this be used to remove lands? Oops, no more islands in your deck?

[–] macji@pawb.social 11 points 2 years ago

Frankly? This sort of response above is unhinged. If this person is as awful as you say, just get them out of your life and move on. Trying to document everything, calling their friends and family, spending this much time on someone who is awful and not worth the time nor the effort? You're going to drive yourself crazy and somehow they're still going to be in your life making you miserable.

I'm sorry this person is terrible to you, but the best "vengeance" is forgetting all about them and being happy doing what you want to do. The more space they take up in your mind, the worse you're going to feel about the whole situation.

 

With Gandalf on the field, Lagrella enters the battlefield and takes two permanents from each player because she is a legendary creature and she is triggering a permanent (herself).

However, when she leaves the battlefield and the other creatures return, her suspended ability puts two +1/+1 counters on those creatures if they enter under your own control (i.e. if you took your own creatures and now they are returning to the field).

If Gandalf is still on the field, would those creatures get four +1/+1 counters instead? Would those creatures only get four counters if they themselves are legendary? Am I completely off the mark and those creatures only ever get two counters regardless of Gandalf?

Thanks for the help!

view more: next ›