They're not being sarcastic, they are repeating Google's (bs) justification
macaroni1556
joined 2 years ago
If only they banned sending mail and reading the newspaper we could have saved those kids.
(you missed the point of my comment)
Having a phone is an important part of participating in society like it or not. Not everyone has a happy home life of a home at all, and flatly banning anyone from owning a phone (purchased themselves) under 16 could further endanger young people already struggling in a dangerous situation. Or even just maintaining a job to survive.
Of course I don't want to live in a world where under 16s need to work, or need to discretely contact help, but we have to face reality. Let's fix that stuff rather than ban communication devices...
Have you tried moving to a new country? You don't just walk in and become a resident. Especially when you're seeking healthcare.
It's built with the assumption that poor people are just irresponsible and if they just had more discipline and mindset they could be a billionaire. 👍
I hope you're trolling because if not you need to do some research into what a battlefield is 👀
This made my day
No hotas support? Gamedevs today smh
Thanks for the edit, much clearer now. Ant is happy.
Most people tell me they could never do it, everyone asks me how I survive the city center crime, and a common question is if I plan to move when I decide to have kids.
Your complaints are the straws and bags don't do enough. My point is that's NOT strict industry-wide regulation. We agree!
Sure, I guess I maintain its that's not what sarcasm is but we do agree on the point