lvxferre

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Dogpiling affects even views that are orthogonal to what the mods would enforce. So it's a more of a general problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I've noticed the start of the dog pile is typically not the issue. Often it starts by accident; like two users coincidentally replying the same thing to a third one, seconds apart, because they didn't see each other's reply. I feel like most people would immediately see it and say "nah, coincidence".

The issue is how it keeps going on and on and on. So perhaps this could be addressed by avoiding the pile to grow, instead of just avoiding it from beginning? Basically, different rules for early and late replies.

I'm just throwing ideas in, mind you.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (13 children)

The downvotes are an example of behaviour typically associated with dogpiling. Focus on the unreasonably large amount of replies adding practically no information each.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (11 children)

A few potential ways to address this:

  1. a rule against dogpiling
  2. a rule against replying without adding new information
  3. harsher enforcement of rules when you notice someone being dogpiled

I'd probably pick #3 but all of them are problematic: #1 and #2 can be misused by the mod because they have huge grey areas, #3 creates double standards. ("So you're saying a «go drink bleach» is OK, but «this is dumb» is not???")

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Got it - sorry for the confusion then!

And I need to admit that your take of the mod = Maxwell's demon thing is way more interesting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The perfect place wouldn’t allow them [people bringing their own shit?] anyway.

As in, isolating the system? No perfect isolation is possible; and even if it was, it would limit the amount of information/entropy of the place. In other words the community would get stale and die.

We could pretend moderators are like Maxwell's demon, able to sift the newbies one by one; if they're bringing shit, don't let them in. The amount of energy necessary to do so makes it unfeasible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

There's a lot of good info in the video. And I recommend people to watch it fully, before taking conclusions about the content.

A few highlights:

  • Speaking practice actually helps a fair bit. At the least with phonetics (training muscle memory) and grammar (you catch patterns you otherwise wouldn't).
  • The three factors he mentions near the end (motivation, self-esteem, anxiety) are what a lot of teachers and professors do wrong - because they make you feel like you're in some group therapy.
  • Even if you don't understand what is said, focus on the situation. He shows this rather well with the Spock example. (i.e. since context dictates the meaning of the text, even if you don't get the text you can still retrieve info from the context.)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just the authors flexing; some papers only have English abstracts, or English + another language, like this.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

The discovery lends physical evidence to long-standing theories regarding Tiwanaku’s influence beyond its core territory. There has been debate among scholars regarding the extent of the civilization’s power, but Palaspata now offers definitive proof of state-level investment in peripheral infrastructure.

Isn't that pretty much established already though? I mean, the 600~1000 CE boil down to Tiahuanaco and Huari splitting the Andes, with both being powerful enough to discourage an invasion from each other. And it's well-established that the Huari had fairly decent peripheral infra-structure, so odds are Tiahuanaco was the same in this aspect.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

The difference between both links is huge - one shows 7%, another 73%. Since I have no idea which is more reliable, nor I think this difference is due to time (the FF link is from 2022), let's go with your link instead.

73% Wayland means 27% X11. It's still a lot; not a big problem in KDE's case, since its developers are rather emphatic on still maintaining the X11 session. Can't say the same about GNOME.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In the same style of your husky: when my cat is too hot she still sleeps almost completely covered - except the paws and tail. It's hilariously cute. Pic related:

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

And the guy in question is, simply put, a nutjob.

I don't even disagree with the idea of ditching X11. My criticism is timing; statistics like this show 90% X usage, either instead or alongside Wayland; it's clear most users still use X11, in one form or another. It's like making a street cars only when most people still use horse chariots.

view more: ‹ prev next ›