look997

(need to know the concept of entropy and homeostasis, and the previous principles of MCU)

When you travel forward in time - in the sense of changing the present as if the configuration of planets, people, the state of knowledge, memory is as in the future (taking information from an alternative line that has already developed to this point in the future), and only keep yourself unchanged - then the state of the amount of information cannot change, so it will be a state containing an anomaly, because entropy must proceed at its own pace, it can't be jumped, delayed or accelerated, when you increase entropy, then with the help of cosmological force, there will be an equalization of the state of the amount of information, so either something will spontaneously decay ("increase" entropy, and actually return to the level of entropy from before the anomaly), or spontaneously appear (as an aside, it can sometimes look like some traveler from an alternative timeline appeared in our line). so you will be the anomaly when you are "in the future", so something will spontaneously arise, because in the state in the future the amount of information is less, and yet there is still the present, so there must come from somewhere (a cosmological force, but nevertheless based on the principles of physics, quantum spontaneity) some portion of information to be as much as there must be in the present.

When you "go back in time," that is, modify the present so that it is in a state from the past, but keeping yourself ("time traveler") from the present, in turn, something must spontaneously begin to disappear (including perhaps yourself), because in the present the amount of information is less, and this must even out.
In practice, a local "reversal in time" can occur without loss, at the expense of global entropy - locally, the amount of information remains the same, but there is more information, so we maintain balance.

Equilibrium is always restored with some inertia, in a fluctuating manner, according to the principles of homeostasis, so and traveling back and forth in time, there will be spontaneous appearance and disappearance of things (information, structures), until a state of equilibrium is reached, then the fluctuations will stop.
This is not something that occurs only with "time travel", when, as part of the normal (consistent with the progression of entropy) destroy something, then the amount of information decreases, so the result will also be the spontaneous emergence of information "somewhere else" to restore equilibrium.

PS I made this up a while ago.

(need to know the concept of entropy and homeostasis, and the previous principles of MCU)

When you travel forward in time - in the sense of changing the present as if the configuration of planets, people, the state of knowledge, memory is as in the future (taking information from an alternative line that has already developed to this point in the future), and only keep yourself unchanged - then the state of the amount of information cannot change, so it will be a state containing an anomaly, because entropy must proceed at its own pace, it can't be jumped, delayed or accelerated, when you increase entropy, then with the help of cosmological force, there will be an equalization of the state of the amount of information, so either something will spontaneously decay ("increase" entropy, and actually return to the level of entropy from before the anomaly), or spontaneously appear (as an aside, it can sometimes look like some traveler from an alternative timeline appeared in our line). so you will be the anomaly when you are "in the future", so something will spontaneously arise, because in the state in the future the amount of information is less, and yet there is still the present, so there must come from somewhere (a cosmological force, but nevertheless based on the principles of physics, quantum spontaneity) some portion of information to be as much as there must be in the present.

When you "go back in time," that is, modify the present so that it is in a state from the past, but keeping yourself ("time traveler") from the present, in turn, something must spontaneously begin to disappear (including perhaps yourself), because in the present the amount of information is less, and this must even out.
In practice, a local "reversal in time" can occur without loss, at the expense of global entropy - locally, the amount of information remains the same, but there is more information, so we maintain balance.

Equilibrium is always restored with some inertia, in a fluctuating manner, according to the principles of homeostasis, so and traveling back and forth in time, there will be spontaneous appearance and disappearance of things (information, structures), until a state of equilibrium is reached, then the fluctuations will stop.
This is not something that occurs only with "time travel", when, as part of the normal (consistent with the progression of entropy) destroy something, then the amount of information decreases, so the result will also be the spontaneous emergence of information "somewhere else" to restore equilibrium.

PS I made this up a while ago.

Where is ernes? What is going on? There are so many things to do on kbin.
Please, I want information. What is going on again? Why can't someone take over the project?

There are doubts about the copyright of AI-generated music.
Should AI music be subject to copyright?

If AI music is subject to copyright, imagine a scenario where AI generates billions of different random songs, across the scale of diversity, this music will be published, it will have maybe 0-2 listens, but it will be officially released.
In this way, the owner of this AI will reserve all possible new music in the world for himself.
He will be able to sue every new artist for plagiarism, because what is the chance that his AI did not generate something similar, at such a scale of generation?

What if AI music is not subject to copyright? If, for example, they were automatically in the public domain?
An almost identical scenario may occur, also AI will generate billions of various random songs, on the entire scale of diversity, this music will be published... but this time artists will no longer be able to profit from music that will be in some way similar to that generated by AI, and any new music, will be similar to those billions of songs generated by AI.

Even the artist's sense of not having created something original could be demotivating for him, even if it were established that AI music is not in the public domain and it would be possible to duplicate and monetize music similar to that generated by AI.
And then another scenario may arise, that pseudo-artists will deliberately review finished AI-generated songs, and will "take over"/occupy the copyrights to these songs. It's also not a pretty scenario.

So what, ban AI music and force it to be removed from the Internet? Drive AI music underground?

However, the current law is adapted to people who have limited ability to produce music.
In fact, even before generative music, there was a problem of songs being similar to each other, and about a hundred years of universal copyright was enough.
Now we're firing up the roller skates.

Who controls karab.in? it has not turned on for several weeks or even months.

test https://kbin.social/m/[email protected]/t/941990

#random

test 2 https://programming.dev/post/13631654

test https://wspanialy.eu/@pgronkievitz/112370819974543838

NeuraLink will allow you to speak entire words or sentences telepathically; when a person has no voice, the AI ​​will generate brain-to-speak your voice, according to your choice, and play it on a regular loudspeaker for people around you.
The same goes for brain-to-text when you want to reply to someone.

But going further, words, sentences, entire statements can be generated by AI, based on the emotion read from the brain in relation to a question.
It may even be that you won't have to read the question at all, the chip will only ask you how you feel about a certain question or stimulus, and it will generate the entire answer itself and respond on your behalf, without even your knowledge.
At the end, it may inform you what it replied to and to whom, and you can decide for yourself whether you actually agree with this answer, but usually you will agree because it is simply convenient that the AI ​​will think about the answer for you. You don't have to make an effort or think anymore, so you agree to it.

Some people have a problem that upvotes and likes even exist.
And I would go further.
A chip in the brain that reads what you think and feel about a given entry, and automatically adds a reaction based on your thoughts and feelings.
Because not everyone wants to click like, and they think about something once they've read it.
And even writing a comment by AI, based on what the chip reads.
AI puts the read brain flashes into words.

There are at least several types of holes in the federation: * Unfederated profile - support suggestion here https://codeberg.org/Kbin/kbin-core/issues/1341 * unfederated replies to the post at a given time * unfederated entries at the time How to handle this? Answers I often see ...