The enemies being spongy is kind of expected, and even a good thing, in a game like this, I think. For your weapon upgrades and damage perks to feel impactful, you can't be killing enemies too quickly at the start. And it also incentivises you to find ways to avoid combat if you're not planning on building into weapon/damage upgrades. I get that it can feel immersion-breaking for some people (though not for me, thankfully), but I think it's pretty important on a mechanical level in RPGs.
loobkoob
joined 2 years ago
The whole website needs to be xeeted out of xistence at this point.
+1 for kbin (which I am commenting from). I initially chose kbin because I liked the UI more than Lemmy's, but I've come to really appreciate the fact that it supports microblogging as well.
I know multiple queer people who use "faggot" in a way that lets them take ownership of the word rather than allow it to be a slur. But importantly, there's context to them saying it that makes it clear it's not a slur. It'll be among friends who know them well enough, or on dating profiles/kink websites where it's abundantly clear from how they use it and everything else they've written that it's them reclaiming the word.
Your comment doesn't have that context. You're an anonymous stranger in a thread filled with anonymous strangers, and there's nothing about your comment that implies you're not using the word as a slur. In fact, the way you used it was as a pejorative. It comes off as offensive and inappropriate.
If a single one of those niche subreddits disappears, the site will be fine. So, sure, you can argue they're individually irrelevant to Reddit as a platform, I guess. But Reddit having a vast collection of niche subreddits is what keeps the platform alive. Do you think people would be nearly as engaged in the long term if it was only world news, politics and memes? Those broad categories are going to have the widest appeal but they're not what a lot of people stay for. They stay so they can discuss their favourite TV show, the specific game they're playing right now, the niche hobby they're interested in, the particular celebrity they're weirdly obsessed with, that incredibly specific kind of porn that gets them off.
And there's a reason a lot of people add "reddit" to the end of their Google searches - there are all kinds of niche subreddits with information they're looking for about a particular issue they're having right now. If I'm having issues with my electric garage door, having a high-quality, well-maintained forum dedicated to the subject - filled with experts and knowledgeable enthusiasts - is exactly what I need, and Reddit had that.
Memes might have a broader appeal and be more monetisable right now, but losing all the niche subfora is something that will hurt Reddit in the long term.
I'm not from the US either so I can't speak to how common a name it is. But Barbie is a diminutive of Barbara (and the dolls were actually named after the creator's daughter, Barbara Handler). Barbara isn't a particularly common name nowadays, so I doubt there are that many Barbies around. And it's probably less common because of how strong the association of the name Barbie is with the brand these days, too.
But it is a real name.
What's a little treason among friends, eh?
Which really illustrates how much of a bubble waiting to burst online advertising is. Ads on pages like those don't translate into any real-world value for anyone. The advertisers are paying out but they're not actually gaining any sales/users for their money at all because no-one is mistyping a website name, then clicking an advert on the crappy-looking page that comes up, and then deciding to buy/use a product/service from that advert.
I can only assume from this comment that you're American. In countries with nationalised healthcare, our medical professionals don't profit at all from selling medication; they prescribe medication because it is what their patients need. America might have a profit-driven healthcare system but don't assume that every country does.
You're right. My CEO deserves 118x my pay because I only work 8 hours a day, while they work 944 hours a day...
Yes, a CEO will likely have the most individual impact on a company, but that doesn't mean what they're doing is necessarily harder work than what someone on the shop floor is doing. They have more individual impact because they're CEO; they're not CEO because of their individual impact. Take that person from the shop floor and put them in the CEO position and they'll then be the one with the most individual impact instead.
It's a different set of skills, sure. But one of those skills is definitely "being good at persuading people who make the actual product / provide the actual service to work for far, far less money than the CEO who simply co-ordinates it all".
The "A-list actor" isn't much of a thing nowadays - it's all much more about franchises - but star power used to be a real box office draw. People would go to see a film just because it was the new Johnny Depp film, for instance, regardless of the genre/plot/style/quality.
There aren't many actors these days who have that kind of draw. Two that I can think of are Ryan Reynolds and Tom Cruise - both actors where you have a fairly good idea of what you'll get from a film they're in, even when you know nothing about it.
Franchises have definitely taken over. People will go to the cinema to see a film because it's a Marvel film, a Star Wars film, etc, regardless of who directed it, who it stars, and the quality of the film. Sequels and cinematic universes sell tickets in the way familiar faces used to.
I mentioned this one to my friends the other day and it took so much convincing before they actually believed me! Definitely an interesting one. Venus also spins the opposite direction to all the other planets in the solar system, meaning the sun rises in the west and sets in the east.