lemonmelon

Proposing a very specific limit on posts referring mod/admin actions taken against users on LBZ that directly fall afoul of their instance rules regarding very specific gatekeeping might have some value. The subject has been hashed and re-hashed too fucking much. Their rules are their rules, breaking those rules on the instance is clear YDI. Breaking those rules elsewhere and having action taken against you is arguably PTB. I'm in favor of the idea of putting that on wax.

Purging previous discussion is no good, and even the proposal, coming from a community mod as it does, rubs me the wrong way. It shouldn't, because you have just as much right to propose a change as any other community member, but it puts me on edge.

There is value in what's been said already, even if some of it is highly disagreeable. Suggesting removal of that record for any reason invites future discussion of the same, IMO. Not everyone who will ever be a member of this community is a member now. If we're going to consider making a rule about this whole mess, best to leave the roadmap that led us here intact.

Potential yes to a well-defined rule of specific, narrow scope. Hard, hard no to retroactive application of that rule.

Connections
Puzzle #631
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨

Stacked #128
🟪🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨
🟥

Wordle 1,350 6/6*

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟨⬛⬛
⬛🟩⬛🟨⬛
🟩🟩⬛⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Connections
Puzzle #628
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨

Wordle 1,348 6/6*

⬛🟨🟩⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟩🟩⬛
⬛⬛🟩🟩⬛
🟨⬛🟩🟩⬛
⬛⬛🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Connections
Puzzle #626
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨

Connections
Puzzle #625
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨

This one deserves any criticism it receives.

I've always been in the "different word each day" camp, but I think there are many here who have a set starter.

Wordle 1,346 4/6*

⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
🟨⬛🟨⬛🟩
⬛🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Connections
Puzzle #624
🟪🟪🟪🟪
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩