"Safe" being defined in a user-hostile manier, i.e. with unmodified Google components and not rooted.
"Google-controlled" would be a better word.
koper
joined 2 years ago
"I dropped my fair share of hard Rs back then"
Such is the fate of hypercentralized spaces. The fediverse fixes this.
Women can choose to wear a hijab, just like women can choose to be a stay at home parent, out of their free will. But pressuring them one way or the other is cringe.
Would there be any evidence that could satisfy you, or are you just looking for a reason to dismiss this?
>Open post criticizing the US
>Look inside
>Whataboutism
Every time
Leftists fighting leftists would be pretty on brand, but in that case they'd both call each other fascists. So you're probably right.
I don't see how this is so difficult. Given the choice between a narcissistic billionaire or an independent, accountable government commission that's bound by the rule of law, I'll choose the latter every time.
peace
(Subject to availability in your area)
Wat ik me kan voorstellen is dat als je "enkel" een huis erft dat je dan opgezadeld wordt met belasting die je niet kunt betalen tot je het huis hebt verkocht;
Daar zijn al regels voor. De termijn voor het doen van aangifte voor erfbelasting is ten eerste erg ruim (8 maanden). Daarbovenop kun je nog uitstel krijgen (4 maanden standaard, of zelfs meer dan een jaar als je een woning erft).
They are not above the law, because these is no law in the US that regulates how social media platforms should be moderated. This is new territory. The EU only recently passed the Digital Services Act that broadly deals with this topic.
Why do you keep posting articles from CIA-funded outlets?