kn98

No, because one transaction uses as much energy as a normal household in a year. Or something like that.

Both based on Bing’s search engine

Het doet bijna denken aan de Chinese Culturele Revolutie. Kranten, boeken, theater en musea gaan omhoog in BTW-tarief want intellectuele hobby’s. Tokkiehobbies zoals bioscopen en pretparken niet. (Ik hou ook van tokkiehobbies hoor.)

https://archive.ph/T0hFN#0%25

Hier is nog een kopie

Dankje! Ik heb de link inmiddels geüpdatet, nu is de opmaak van de originele pagina behouden.

Initial distribution was through a captcha-protected crypto ‘faucet’. The faucet is still up. Did the developers keep a large part of the coins themselves? I’ve never heard that.

No, because I’m not a trader. It’s not all about the exchange rate for me, but about the utility of the coin.

Most coins exist because other coins exist. Nano and Monero not necessarily.

I like it as a way to donate to creators without revealing my identity. It comes close to handing over cash.

You could also use it to pay for a VPN, but since the VPN provider sees your original IP address anyways, I don’t think that’s useful.

I only like two cryptocurrencies.

Nano: free transactions, each wallet runs it’s own blockchain, so it’s got no negative impact on the environment.

Monero: allows for anonymous transfers

https://archive.ph en https://ghostarchive.org hebben volgens mij niks met archive.org te maken.

Dat klopt, het zijn losse initiatieven. Maar beide zijn goede projecten om aan te doneren, als je het mij vraagt.

Voor de liefhebbers, een kopie van de pagina:

https://archive.ph/T0hFN#0%25

Right. But if things do start to cost money, should that be stopped by laws?