do you mean of not voting for them?
people don't vote, democrats lose, they think it's because they're too far left and move further to the right. meanwhile republican victories embolden them to push even harder into fascism
do you mean of not voting for them?
people don't vote, democrats lose, they think it's because they're too far left and move further to the right. meanwhile republican victories embolden them to push even harder into fascism
ohhh this is an old story. I was like wtf it happened again????
split the cost with a few more roommates and maybe
That's just straight out of the abstract of the paper, no journalists involved.
that free la croix tho 👀
bold of you to assume they don't have even more struggles than what they listed off there
why are they mostly in the south but then there's just randomly one in alaska
I have to disagree. Like if most people were asking for more genocide, you should still not do genocide. Morality/ethics always need to come first.
But of course that doesn't matter here, seeing as both the people and the ethics are in agreement that genocide is bad.
oop there was a real stupid typo where I forgot the minus sign lmao
it's fixed now
I'd prefer an alternative definition that starts with the base case ¡0! = 1, and then for n > 0 we define ¡n! = n * -¡(n-1)!
please don't smoke, it's bad for you
girlsmoke instead :3
rich and gay