I feel like any reddit that asks questions should not have a Lemmy bot. Like I just saw a bot for r/whatisthis and I just can't understand the logic. Who would EVER answer a question when the OP can't even see the response. I didn't want to rant about it, but really, how can we get in contact with the bot creators???
Meanwhile, something as simple as calvin and hobbs clips are being manually posted on a daily schedule by a regular Lemmy user.
Same. I have a civil engineering friend, I've wanted to show her this for so long and now I finally can!
It avoids the need for cloud storage.
If I'm out somewhere, with no device on me, I can still generate my passwords
I love seeing natural number support as the first example (instead of float)
The abbreviation method LessPass uses works pretty well. Its usually only a problem with a re-branding, like how wefwef changed to voyager. When that happens it's not too big of a deal, I just change it to the new thing.
What is a big problem with the URL though is login portals. Like when it's some conglomerated system that involves a million redirects, and/or a "login with XYZ". They can get some really weird URLs that have nothing to do with the actual site and those are a real pain.
#3 isn't true. There's a username field, so you just put in the username of the alt accounts.
Your point about the master password and two factor is a good one though.
In practice password restrictions are rare (like 1% of sites), but they are problematic when they happen because there's so many different ways to restrict passwords and trying all combinations is impractical. Needing the counter is exceedingly rare. Remembering the username isn't a problem, but if you don't have a consistent policy of always-using-a-username or always-using-the-email (as the lesspass username) it can be difficult to remember that. Similar situation with the URL, if it's not abbreviated consistently, then it's a problem.
That said, I still use LessPass for everything and just deal with the edgecase problems.
Despite what others are saying, I've been using it for a couple years and it can work great if you're okay with the trade-offs.
Of the three (Integrity, Confidentiality, Availability) it has better availability than cloud storage which is what I care about. Even when the LessPass site is down, there's an IPFS version, mirrors, local cache, etc so it's basically always possible to derive any password.
At a user level, it's very impractical (and a slight risk) to always retype the master password at every single login screen. However, letting the local autofill save the password doesn't defeat the point of LessPass. Why? because, if you only use local storage, and you're traveling and your phone breaks, you're now locked out of every account. With LessPass, you're fine as soon as you get an internet connection.
There are a few caveats.
I disagree. Imagine any club or group of people getting together to tackle a problem, with a common vision, a culture, and social values. It can be more than just liking the people, as the group-ideals can kept even as the people cycle in and out.
You can like club/organization for what actions it encourages, what it stands for, the benefit it provides people with, and the lines it collectively agrees not to cross.
Some good organizations have revenue, and we call them businesses.
I agree 99.9% of companies "won't love you back" but it's not 100%.
I've used racket before and I did not know about this! If you're willing to share I'd love to hear more about how you defined that assembly lang.
Linting let's you use indentation based block delineation instead of curly brackets while keeping the rest of the language functionality?
Thanks for sharing your experience, and yeah I would be interested in a group. I am worried it would fall apart without some kind of penalty for not showing up. Over and over I've had the experience:
At least part (but not most) of it is I can tell other people "I'm going to get penalized if I don't go" and then that person is okay with me not doing their event/request.
The bad advice problem is why I feel like, yes, a small group would be helpful, the advice would come from other people with ADHD not the coach. However, in my experience, a group of 5 people with ADHD takes about 45sec before the conversation goes off on a random tangent with the original topic never to be seen again. The coach would just be the conductor of the conversation. E.g. "hey joe, last week you said X, how is that going", making sure someone doesnt dominate the conversation, having a checklist, etc. That's why I feel like both combined would work well.
In terms of improvement, I'd like be able to get feedback on small things, like an email I'm hung up on that I need to respond to. Stuff that isn't really worth posting about, and may have personal details.
But also, I myself have gathered a lot of strategies, tools, and advice over the decades and I'd like to be able to share those with people. Posts are good, but with a low attention span it's best to give advice directly when it's needed instead of just "maybe you can use this 3 months from now"