people who advocate for animal welfare tend to also be more outspoken against human suffering
If I got a cent for every time I've heard an animal advocate say "I love animals, I hate people"... I'd have a couple bucks already. This thread seems to count towards that.
This isn’t a zero-sum game you can help people and the animals at the same time.
Prove it.
Show me how you get the resources to do both. Animalists are high on saving whales, kitties, puppies, etc. while letting their neighbors die home alone, or worse... when not directly saying "I love animals, I hate people".
Please leave this thread and post articles about human suffering
No, I think I'm right where I should be. I don't doompost either.
You "love" the idea to "force" people to suffer, because they aren't your chosen ones?
Are you sure?
How does this fit into these two pieces of news?
In their email, Jagex management also told staff: “[...] Our job is not to use the game as an outlet for our own views, but to craft worlds that serve our players, offering immersion, escape and meaning.
Well, isn't that some of the best BS contortionist corpospeak I've seen in some time...
A law, to be law, needs to be enforceable, otherwise it's just a suggestion. International law is only enforceable through voluntary compliance, coercion, or war. Yes, during peace time many countries pick the voluntary way, others need coercion... and some ignore everything.
Curfews and martial law, are war-time measures. Check how they work in countries openly at war. If you get them in a country "at peace"... well, I have bad news, but it isn't really at peace.
When you get a government fighting its own population, that isn't simply oppression, that's civil war.
Martial law, curfews, IDs, "papers", etc. are intended to protect a nation's citizens against enemy units... in times of war. The problem comes when someone is allowed to re-classify "some residents" as "enemies"... then you get a civil war.
International law is a bunch of agreements for peace time, for countries to enforce onto their own citizens. Trying to enforce any law against the will of a country, is an act of war. Most countries, don't want to go to war, they'd rather look for loopholes like sanctions, that don't require invading a country and spanking its leaders.
What you need, is to recognize the early signs of deranged leaders, and prevent them from gaining power. That moment has passed in the US, now it's in the hands of people with power (money, guns, cult leaders) to decide whether to go into a civil war or not.
You may try talking to them, but whether they're willing to listen is a separate question.
Article 1, Section 9 of the US Constitution states, "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."
On a national level, both the US President and the US Congress have the power
martial law has been imposed at least 68 times in limited, usually local areas of the United States
Right now, the US border is under "invasion by undocumented alien criminals", and there is a mounting "rebellion in Los Angeles".
Honestly, I'm kind of surprised they've been waiting so long, the "invasion" Executive Order 14159 has been in force since Jan 20, 2025... but I guess they first needed to make sure to dismantle any internal opposition, put key people in key places, and so on.
Let's not forget this handy list:
Licensing the algorithm would also have another consequence: SEO optimizers.
Google uses their algorithm to both push ads, and to punish content farms. Imagine for a second what Google results would look like, if content farms could run the algorithm preemptively to optimize massive amounts of AI slop.
The official White House social media accounts on X, Instagram and Facebook soon quoted his post, all sharing a fake magazine cover depicting an illustration of Trump smiling in a suit — and wearing a bejeweled golden crown.
Hm, makes sense, but I feel like we're still missing something.
I saw comments about Durov, similar to this investigation, maybe around a month ago.
With the xAI partnership news, I looked into it and found this nice thing:
In Telegram, you can clear them one by one, or date ranges, or use disappearing messages, but this tool still found some I had missed.
(Disclaimer: I got pulled into Telegram by some friends leaving WhatsApp with the policy changes of 2021, my threat model is less one of FSB, and more one of indiscriminate AI siphoning for ad targeting)