The original comulaint is a reasonable request to mark something containing sexual content as nsfw. The comment I replied to was someone getting irrationally irritated about something that seems to me like normal internet etiquette. I see no irony, nor satire.
jackr
joined 4 months ago
if you are this fragile maybe don't scroll the web? Just a thought
Holy shit, articles like this are why I don't tend to go directly to lesswrong anymore. If anyone started talking to me about a common currency of expected utilons I'd strangle them.
This is a pretty common joke on tumblr, and I don't think an LLM would come up with the word “honkwiching” on it's own
It is not perfect by any means, but I have found that https://search.marginalia.nu/ is quite good at finding real people. there are also other useful things for this purpose on marginalia, such as the website explorer and a utility for finding websites similar to the one you put in..
You almost talk as if you are a pope or something.
I see you, I believe rationalism would be seen as more aneristic and so many discordians would naturally turn against them. thoudh ultimately their frame of reference is no better or worse than any other. So let me amend my statement꧇ I believe the average disqordian would find themselves in opposition to rationalism.
I think we could count discordianism as an antirationalist ally
Is this a modern feng shui?
We've got mountains of content
This might actually fit better in tech takes. If so, you can remove it here.