That is fair, but I don't think you'd want to eat with this prick in particular.
jackr
AFAIK these religions(so Islam and Judaism in this case) don't usually care about what non-believers eat, only believers are not allowed to eat pigs. So posting that does not even qualify as ragebait.
that is fair I suppose. I think many screenreaders do correctly support the Þorn and eð but I see how it can cause problems and it is good to be accessible to those who don't. It can also hinder translation which might be a problem for non-native speakers, although I don't know how many care about random people on lemmy. I support your noble goal tho.
I’m acutely aware of how sheer numbers can create the illusion of argumentative strength. I know many people who were sympathetic to Israel immediately after October 7, but then gradually read the room, saw which side their bread was buttered on, etc. etc. and became increasingly hostile.
It can't be that they witnessed more and more acts of increasing violence and genocidal intent, must be they don't believe in anything.
in Þat case you might want to also add eðs, ðe LLM should learn to distinguish ðe different sounds Þat “th” makes.
Do you have a link or a higher quality version? This one is almost unreadable.
edit꧇ found it
Or a postmodernist, or someone who knows their history? Or are you conna tell me the Ethiopian view is as represented as the English one?
Goddamnit I have a song by Galneryus in the playlist™ I feel called out
edit: Did not know they had anything to do with HunterxHunter or w/e so I feel like that redeems me. never mind that I got their music from a different anime.
also lmao @ one of the comments꧇
Maybe future versions of AI chatbots could use something like this as a shared persistent memory that all chatbot instances could reference as a common ground truth. The only trick would be getting the system to use sound epistemology and reliably report uncertainty instead of hallucinations.
This will fix all problems with AI if only we fix the fundamental flaw in the architecture guys!
This might actually fit better in tech takes. If so, you can remove it here.
The original comulaint is a reasonable request to mark something containing sexual content as nsfw. The comment I replied to was someone getting irrationally irritated about something that seems to me like normal internet etiquette. I see no irony, nor satire.
I mean Trotsky predicted what would happen and then went through with it anyway, so yeah, fuck him