jaark

joined 4 months ago
[–] jaark@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago

Let's hope you pay more attention to the specs given to you by any client than you do to where you're posting your spam.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I don't think my sanity can take all of these explanations.

Though I just spotted one that's worse than null being an object ..

typeof NaN
"number"

I mean, come on.. it's even in the fucking name!

Edit - fixed capitalisation in 'NaN'

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 83 points 1 month ago (38 children)

I'm no expert and I know that javascript is full of wtf moments, but please.. Let it be B

It's not gong to be B, it's it.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 1 points 1 month ago

You are confusing understanding of how they work and what they actually do with hatred.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

.. and turned off.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 7 points 2 months ago

Not to spark rumours and suggest he's in on it all and on the run, but I am struggling to think of any other reason why he would suddenly quit and fly to Dubai. Quitting I could understand, so that he can concentrate on getting this emergency situation sorted out, but it's the choice of destination.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Inexpertly done paywall - view the source in your browser, the full wording is there.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 52 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Are you implying by that that mods are being prevented from operating? The second line implies the opposite .. "If you are experiencing gameplay issues while playing with mods, it's recommended you first try uninstalling your mods"

'Supported' could means that Bethesda will basically ignore any problem reports or support requests whilst mods (which are completely out of their control) are installed - seems reasonable to me.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Miami F1 is the weekend after next. Still time to get organised if you will still be there.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 7 points 3 months ago

It's really hard to see how else it could be seen.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago

Another for Keycloak. Though it is probably overkill for many people's needs in here - it certainly is for mine! But it is what I have up and running and see no need to change to a simpler option.

[–] jaark@infosec.pub 1 points 3 months ago

I'm no battery expert, so pretty much all of this is supposition. I think it's reasonable, but if anyone knows this stuff, please correct any errors!

It is likely that the house power backup is run in an 'offline' mode where the power load is shifted onto the battery circuitry when needed. UPSs for computers run in an 'online' fashion where they are effectively part of the circuit continually. That is why they are so much more responsive. I would imagine that running 'online' puts much more wear and tear on the battery resulting in a significantly lower life-span. Regularly replacing the low power UPS batteries would be very much cheaper than having to replace your home power backup every few years.

I wouldn't class the UPS/Backup power combo as redundant hardware any more than either one of those things are alone. Either one is redundant if the mains power is 100% reliable. Each component is there to help deal with the inherent deficiencies of the overall power system.

Once you have systems that provide meaningful open monitoring protocols, having a single unified view and control plane is just a software problem. I would imagine you could throw data in to something like Grafana to display mains power state, UPS state, backup power state and use the combination of that data to estimate overall run tile and when to trigger a shut down of servers.

view more: next ›