infinitesunrise

joined 4 months ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

That's not how it works. If local cops show up, they only assist ICE. The NYPD in this photo were Brad Lander's (Elected official being kidnapped) entourage. When ICE turned on him, they held the press back from ICE and then the senior member of their group cooperated with ICE and left the building alongside them and Lander. No asking for ID, no asking for a warrant from them, zero resistance, only assistance.

If the Dems want to actually exercise their right to resist a kidnapping they should be showing up with private security, or exercising their own 2A rights (Something that pretty much only politicians and friends of cops can do in NYC because NYPD gets constitutionally-questionable veto power on gun permits). But I'm guessing that is exactly what the Trump regime is waiting for. They will send in the national guard once that happens.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Maybe I shouldn't have been so crass. Maybe you shouldn't have been so obtuse and avoidant. Mistakes were made, had I known your proximity to the people involved ahead of time I probably would have cut you more slack. More communication and explanation up front is always better.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (5 children)

A user wrote that someone who brandishes in public deserves to be shot.

You asked if that applies to people who open carry at McDonalds.

I replied to note that brandishing and open carry are different things.

You replied "Watch the video." As there are several videos floating around relating to this event, and as the video in OP's article does not seem at all relevant or the one that you reference, and you don't offer any reason why some video should be watched, I found this comment to be dismissive, vague, and unhelpful.

So I replied with reference to the similarly vague and unhelpful meme of "read theory" in hopes of cuing you in to the lack of imformation without wasting too much energy on your behalf.

Joke went completely over your head. You began making a character argument on behalf Gamboa as you know the guy. Completely unrelated to where the thread began.

And then when I try to reel you back in to the topic of brandishing vs open carry, you tell me I'm shit at interpreting context.

Come on, buddy. Really? Really??? I'm not someone you should be angry at or fighting with. You seemed to have been confusing brandishing for open carry and I just wanted to make sure you were aware that those are completely different things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (7 children)

What does this have to do with your fantasy of shooting people in a McDonalds?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Jokes on them, Sandustry content deluge incoming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (9 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

My favorite game is Noita. Factorio is probably in my top 5. Pray for my free time, fellow lemmings.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (11 children)

Adding another obligatory "brandishing and open carry are legally distinct acts" to the thread.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Only ~1 in 5 New Yorkers even own a title to a car. These policies very much create a demand for cars that wouldn't exist otherwise. The lot in question is across the street from a stop on one of NYC's main subway lines, and within 5 blocks of a major transit hub.

New Yorkers need to pressure their council members to push back on these policies. I'm sure that developers have the opposite ear of representatives and are also asking for an end to such rules. Representatives need to know that they are hurting, not sheltering, their constituents by resisting change. All of this money could be going to public transit improvements instead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I think you touched on why. Ethnic identity is somewhat arbitrary, and tied up with national / cultural identity. In the US, despite our xenophobic phases most of us culturally identify as a nation of immigrants. So in terms of ethnicity, we're more concerned with where our lineage existed before arriving in the United States, rather than how long it's existed in the United States. There's a bit of a hierarchy of "who's family has existed in the US the longest", but all of those claims are still anchored by which nations their ancestors came from.

There's also the fact that American genetics haven't been sedentary long enough - And probably never will be - For us to mix evenly enough to develop a unified physical appearance. Ethnicity is of course not just skin deep, but ethnic identity and identification often uses it as shorthand, and there is as far as I know no stereotypical American ethnic appearance.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

It's propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well then call me the outlier, cause I'm a childless man who has been happily working remote since before covid. I'd rather be jobless than go back to office work. I have a small group of non-work friends that I enjoy spending time with, and back when I did office work the majority of my friends were not work friends.

 

This is not out in some rural town. This is in Portland, OR about 2 miles from downtown. Personal vehicles this large are simply incompatible with urban living and pressure their owners to continually break traffic law. Technically that Miata is parked as close to the stop sign as it can legally be, but as the Denali doesn't fit in many places around here it's owner is compelled to park across both the stop sign and the crosswalk.

Follow up: To whatever bootlicking idiot called PBOT and asked for enforcement on this block, it didn't help. It made things worse just like I cautioned such actions do in the discussion below. They didn't ticket the truck (Which was indeed parking in front of the stop sign this morning) but they did ticket just about every-other car parked on this street for non-street safety related things like parked wrong orientation, literal broken window, expired registration, etc. You probably cost my neighbors a few thousand dollars in combined citations for minor procedural issues, now everybody is miserable and the truck is still parked there. Please, never ever do that again. Your fantasy of calling law enforcement to fix all the problems is not what happens in real life. It doesn't matter who they are, NEVER CALL THE COPS ON YOUR NEIGHBORS.

 

Last Wednesday night, city council approved the preliminary $8.5 Billion city budget. Controversial from the start, this planned budget from mayor Keith Wilson proposed to slash funding arbitrarily across many city services, while continuing Ted Wheeler's tradition of uncritically lavishing the Portland Police Bureau with tens of millions in budget increases.

However, as this is the first ever Portland city budget that has had to pass the scrutiny of a city council representing and beholden to constituents by geography - If you live in city limits, three of these twelve elected officials now speak on behalf of you in city hall, a representation you did not have prior to last year - The very notion that it's the mayor's privilege to unilaterally present a pre-packaged budget for council to rubber stamp was criticized from the start, and this new city council had been hard at work since then modifying Wilson's proposal.

One cut Wilson made was removing $2 Million in funding for the Parks Department, which would undermine the agency's ability to dependably do things like pick up trash, maintain toilets, fix broken equipment, etc. Hours before council was due to approve the preliminary budget, council member Candace Avalos of District 1 brought a proposal to backfill the hole in Parks created by Wilson by reducing the increase in PPB funding by $2 Million. Not a cut to PPB, just less of a hike. In order to save Parks.

Things got heated. It quickly became apparent where the constituent allegiances of each council member laid. Dan Ryan of District 2 and Eric Zimmerman of District 4 in particular started freaking out. Loretta Smith of District 1 quoted Maya Angelou of all people to back up her support for the police. However all three reps from District 3 - Angelita Morillo, Steve Novick, and Tiffany Koyama Lane - Were unified in supporting the measure when weighing the dire straights for Parks vs the low stakes for PPB. Sameer Kanal of District 2 agreed. His fellow D2 rep Elana Pritle-Guiney feigned a lost spine, claimed that she didn't want to choose between cops and parks, yet voted for cops instead of abstaining. In the end, the measure passed 7 - 5 and Parks was saved. I've collated the votes below. If you're a critic of PPB and the overly privileged political immunity of police and police budgets in the USA, take a good look at here and remember which of your reps, if any, voted nay. Remember where they stand when asked to pit cops against community.

District 1
AYE - Candace Avalos (bill sponsor)
AYE - Jamie Dunphy
NAY - Loretta Smith

District 2
NAY - Dan Ryan
NAY - Elana Pritle-Guiney
AYE - Sameer Kanal

District 3
AYE - Angelita Morillo
AYE - Steve Novick
AYE - Tiffany Koyama Lane

District 4
NAY - Eric Zimmerman
AYE - Mitch Green
NAY - Olivia Clark

If you have 10 minutes to spare, I highly recommend watching the video of council's vote, link to youtube timestamp here

Willamette Week
OPB
Portland Mercury

view more: next ›