huppakee

Maybe change Germany to the country the post is related to after copy and pasting this, it's not they're the only one.

Just wait until you start reading Current Day Events

Only works without mcdrive unfortunately

Well if you have to walk from the parking lot to the beach you'll burn calories.

You forget that there are steps (possible) between data crawling and llm training, i expect they will at least grade the quality (not by hand or anything) and any reasonable company will not want to feed their llm with just about anything. I sure hope competitors do actually filter this garbage out before training their ai.

Couldn't the above output have easily been generated with a prompt like "what arguments do holocaust deniers use?"?

I think that is much more likely than it just straight out denying the holocaust, but my point is that is should be able to churn that out just like it should be able to teach people how to make bombs. An LLM can only give accurate information if ingested that information during its training. I remember for example an early image generator not showing nipples on a woman breastfeeding, likely because it only had access to censured images. Basically the digital varient of the ken doll.

LLMs arent necessarily consistent in telling you about facts since it's just software that knows which words fit well together and itself has no beliefs of what is and isn't true (or even what is and isn't likely). It can easily tell you one thing on monday and another thing on tuesday if it isn't trained well. If the original tweet is actual output and not photoshop, it would show it was trained on holocaust-denying material. The conversation you link to suggest it was trained on factual historic information. But those two things aren't exclusive - it can have had both as training data. That is i think the worrying part, it might have been (accidentally or intentionally) been trained on inaccurate historic 'information'.

Whining about china

So guess you're paycheck doesn't come from Russia then

Let's not hang people in The Hague now

What really happened is already in the article, my questions are about how lawmakers would respond if you openly support the same side they are supporting. That is especially relevant as r i don't expect regular folk to let me walk around showing the same kind of support for genocide. This has nothing to do with the Palestine Action group and what they did or didn't do.

Does this include quid-pro-quos like being invited to speak somewhere or providing lip service to a certain political party? Not all transactions can be measured in terms of monetary values. Think of 'we don't mind supplying you with state-of-the-art spyware, but we can't do that if you make life hard on us and speak out against the genocide we're committing'.

China and Russia are colonial powers, too.

Crazy how tankies think it's only ok if you do it to your neighbours.

Just wondering, if I would hold up a sign with 'go isreal, continue the amazing work you do!', would that get me arrested? Surely i'd get beat up but i mean what would the lawmakers think of that? Would it be different if the sign would say 'go isreal, murder those innocent families' or 'go isreal, your genocide rules!' (am i allowed to call it a genocide if i'm not against it?)