huppakee

joined 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago

If that wasn't cringe enough, here's what the article concludes with:

“I could do this all day,” Trump mused as the leaders took it in turns to flatter him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Thanks for sharing!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

the most-practical and cost-effective approach

This one only goes for people who trust their government or an ngo to come rescue them when there's an disaster or other emergency going on. I am one of those people, but there seems to be a lot of people who don't and want to buy stuff now they can so they can survive as long as they can without any help when the point comes they can't buy these things.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

for days minimum

This will be up to two relevant factors, only the first you know in advance:

  1. The more densily populated an area the more effort will be spend locating survivors, if you survive a flood but live remotely it on average will take longer before you are located.
  2. The extent of the emergency, the bigger the area the more available resources (including effort/ human energy) are spread out. If the flood covers a lot of area, it will on average take longer for help to reach you.

It is very unlikely there will not be any help coming.

If you survive a flood you might have gotten wet which will have massive influence on your ability to maintain a desirable body temperature. If the flood comes with bad weather and you have no acces to heating or a place to shelter hypothermia might kill you before contaminated water can. If you can shelter in place and you're safe in your own (or somebody elses) home bottled water and/or a water filter might be a great thing though, just trying to say what you'll need depends entirely on what situation you end up in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I'm confused, what exactly is homo about these liberal monsters?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

You're out of luck, we've had this for years now and it hasn't turned out to be as contagious as cookie pop-ups have

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My belief of what this community dislikes comes down to shitty infrastructure and danger to unprotected individuals just having a good time. Also a bit fossil fuels, but I feel that's mainly a bonus point here. So motorcycles fall in the category car infrastructure and danger to others at high speed (and a small bit fossil fuel), but ebikes fall in the category bike infrastructure so that's good although they are still a danger at high speeds but then again also no fossil fuels.

So scoring between -2.5 (heavy car with ice) to +2.5 (slow durable bike), I'd say ebikes score at least +1.5 here. Wich you could translate to 4 out of 5 or 8 out of 10 so very much not like motorcycles which I would score -2, which is 3 out of 10.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Friendly reminder to take a functioning measurement system with you when traveling in the us

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

late night cafe culture

I disagree but since yall are piss drunk at 11 pm I understand you dont remember much

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Europeans stuck on funding the USA dispite affordable stickers spreading the #BuyEuropean message.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

Like it's our fault the rest of the world turned to autocratic anarchy /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Precies dit, ik denk dat het overgrote deel van de huurders niet weten dat de mensen in een koopwoning een groot belastingvoordeel krijgen terwijl andersom bijna iedereen met een koopwoning dat wel weet.

view more: ‹ prev next ›