hiddengoat

Narrator, who happens to be the ACLU: "It was."

"I don't understand why a business needs people that aren't on the assembly line." - You, showing the world your ass.

I spent three hours driving fifteen miles through Austin last weekend. Do not talk to me about traffic. I am become traffic, destroyer of road trip timetables.

There is some speculation that the special prosecutors are right-wingers prosecuting known left-winger Baldwin. I find this stupid, and there's a much simple explanation.

The special prosecutors are two middling private attorneys who are now looking at being responsible for the prosecution of a very well known celebrity and getting a win on this means they look good in front of the DA. They will absolutely fight tooth and nail to get him convicted no matter how fucking flimsy the case is because it's politically expedient for them to win.

If you ever watched The Wire... winning this case gives them MAJOR suction with the DA.

That's weird, because the Holy Spirit compels me to shower Nazis in .45 ACP.

THE HOLY SPIRIT OF MURICA

1. Non-commercial and ethical clauses. These are commonly seen attempts to restrict licenses in violation of OSD 6, “No Discrimination Against Field of Endeavor.” These types of clauses limit where, why and how the software can be used.

It's that simple. Any attempt to restrict who can use the software, and how they can use it, renders it OSD incompatible. Chiefly, with this:

1. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor
   The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

I suggest you learn how free software actually works unless you want to look like an idiot.

Prosecutors then had the replica gun forensically tested and had some parts of the weapon replaced after it was broken during the FBI's testing.

This is pretty much a mistrial right here, if it even gets that far. It would take barely more than zero effort to make the case that altering the firearm after the FBI's testing was enough to invalidate any results the prosecutors came up with.

I do not know why this is even a point that matters. He was on a set, in his capacity as an actor, blocking a scene with the cinematographer. This was a scene in which the gun was fired close to the camera. Him pulling the trigger was his job. The fact that the armorer did not do their fucking job and control live weapons on set is where the culpability actually is.

With as little effort as it is possible for a human to put into something without literally just collapsing from muscle failure.