Wenn die reichsten 10% im Schnitt 270.000€ besitzen und es Millionäre und Milliardäre gibt die den Schnitt gut nach oben ziehen heißt das doch im Umkehrschluss dass man vermutlich wenn man auch nur ein bisschen Erspartes im 5-stelligen Bereich hat da schon sehr nah an den reichsten 10% dran ist oder nicht?
hh93
joined 2 years ago
Als jemand der in Magdeburg wohnt und als Schiedsrichter schon häufiger im Umland unterwegs war kann ich echt nur unterschreiben dass da aufm Land teilweise sehr fragwürdige gestalten rumlaufen.
Wenn sich die Zuschauer am Spielfeldrand drüber aufregen dass man ja jetzt die Spieler der eigenen Mannschaft nicht mehr als Ne*er bezeichnen darf weiß man man ist sehr weit unten angekommen...
Putting that kind of switch on a password safe seems to be the best option by far.
Not having to worry about single accounts and on top also having the ability to save insurance numbers, bank accounts etc. - if tagged/organised correctly a password-safe would've helped to much by not having to dig through binders of papers to see which insurances where running and which not for example and if you missed an account or some portfolio
Just use a password manager and set a switch up there
Then (if you have a well structured password safe) you also give whoever you choose to give it to information about your bank accounts or insurance numbers that relatives might not be aware of
Going through all the books to figure out what's relevant and what you have to care for is a huge pain.
I don't know if I'd want my lawyer to spend hours (that I'd have to pay for) in order to get access to accounts that might be relevant.
Who knows what's relevant in the end?
Sure if you're saving the logins for porn inside your manager, too, then it's going to be awkward but so is the old-school porn-box under the bed or the toys-drawer
How much are you paying at a gas station?
Here in Germany it's 2€/liter
That's because you are not in a position to produce and sell a game.
As a user it sure is the case but as a developer you are in a position that you either have to take their 30% cut or accept that you are selling way less
The fact that pretty much immediately after epic launched their store steam lowered the cut for big publishers tells you that they are fully aware that 30% is too much to be reasonable but they completely could get away with that because Devs just didn't have a choice.
Because of epic that now changed since even if you don't actually sell more games you at least can get a guaranteed profit as if you sold those games that you miss out on by not being on steam.
Sure the way epic is doing it is not good but I really don't see another way how a significant number of buyers would ever come to another store. That didn't work for EA, that didn't work for Ubisoft, that also didn't work for GOG where you actually own the game without DRM and not just a license to play it as long as the server is allowing you.
People are fundamentally lazy and hate changing their routines - that's why forcing them into buying at your store is necessary if you want to get them to switch.
I mean that's the same side that steam is using their monopoly for, too
For the users it's definitely the most relaxed option - but as a developer if you choose to not put up with steams 30% rule you are fucked.
The fact that pretty much immediately after epic gained traction steam announced cheaper rates for bigger publishers tells you that they definitely are aware of how 30% is too much
Personally that's why I buy all my games on gog if possible even though I have a Steamdeck and that makes stuff more complicated.
People denying steam has a monopoly are probably also denying other fundamental truths that would imply that they had to change their lifestyle (climate change anyone?)
Warum sind es gefüllt eigentlich immer die konservativen die am lauteten etwas Anklagen die sich genau dessen schuldig gemacht haben?
Ist ja fast so als wäre es ein Grundbestandteil der Opposition erstmal prinzipiell dagegen zu sein wenn es auch nur ein paar nicht adressierte bedenken gibt
Isn't it also genetically that all orange cats are male?
It is a monopoly - they just don't abuse it as much against their audience.
For developers it's either take their 30% deal or just don't sell your game because a lot of people only use steam.
Not even Cyberpunk or the Witcher could sell more on gog than on steam even though you knew that there the developers got 100% of the money spent. Gwent standalone flopped so hard on GOG that it had to be rereleased with limited features on steam and sold more there
People are just fundamentally lazy so it totally is a problem that you have one store with such a massive market share even if it's very convenient for the end-user they can completely exploit their position against publishers.
Sure EPICs way of making games exclusive to their store is not elegant but without that no-one would choose that store over steam
Es gibt Millionäre und Milliardäre - wieso wird dann der Durchschnitt des Vermögens der oberen 10% angegeben aber nicht wo dieses beginnt?
Wenn es trotz solch krassen Ausreißern mit Milliarden an vermögen noch im Schnitt bei 270.000 liegt würde es mich nicht wundern wenn man in Deutschland schon Teil der 10% ist wenn man zum deutschen Mittelstand zählt