hh93

Depending on the game I'd even do the opposite.

I don't care for the 20th fight against bandits to be hard - but a boss should feel like more of a challenge and take more time to finish.

With how directly Control tied into the Alan Wake universe with their DLC being completely centered around it I'd be really surprised if they wouldn't go even further now

Habe es vor anderthalb Jahren mal probiert als ich Alternativen für YNAB gesucht hatte und war zu dem Zeitpunkt der vielversprechendste Kandidat.

Aber glaube mir hatte damals fundamental missfallen wie geplante Transaktionen behandelt worden sind weshalb ich dann wieder zurück bin.

Ggf mal Zeit sich das nochmal an zu gucken wenn man es selfhosten kann

"But won't anyone think of the" in regards to gays and drag-queens is such a bullshit since that 'argument' usually comes from the religious people

Quitting the church is helping more children than banning people from living out their sexuality in a harmless way ever could

That's what Israel is trying tbh

Not a huge fan of the gameplay but absolutely loved the atmosphere and mystery of that game.

And the soundtrack was really good, too

Not to mention identity fraud already being commons there

For sure fraud won't be totally rampant...

Also I think the hardest part of being a bank is the shitton of regulations (especially in Europe) and not the software.

Twitter might need to hire a lot of experts and lawyers in that field to make it work.

Also banks are all about trust - and that's precisely what Elon lost for most people in the last year

Yeah - if you say "fuck both of you" and kill both the dwarves and here then I'm pretty sure that she's fine with that

Instead of disabling autosave you could also give the advice to only save the game if your characters are standing still or if you are currently in a dialogue at a point where you can select an option

That should make it impossible to save the game while autosave is running

Es bräuchte halt echt ein ranked choice voting damit die die jetzt zur Wagenknecht Partei sind weil sie sich bisher nicht repräsentiert gefühlt haben oder die die die AfD nur aus Protest wählen obwohl sie eigentlich nicht rechts wählen wollen (soll es ja leider geben) die Möglichkeit haben sich auch unter den kleinstparteien um zu gucken ohne dass man das Gefühl hat damit eh nichts zu erreichen.

Gerade wenn bei der nächsten Wahl noch Linke und FDP mit 4-5% an der Hürde scheitern und die Basis weiter bei 2-3% hängt laufen wir auf eine Situation zu wo bei sowieso schon niedriger Wahlbeteiligung die Stimme von jedem 5. der zur Wahl gegangen ist einfach keine Anwendung findet...

The idea of people being human shields in their own homes is genocidal bullshit used to justify killing them.

So how do you call it if hamas is building their bases of operation in civilian buildings or launch their rockets from schools and hospitals exactly because they KNOW it's impossible to target them there without also hitting civilians?

Why is egypt not accepting refugees? Because they know that a big part of the palestinians are actually supporting hamas and are not just victims here and they don't want to deal with the risk of those people radicalizing themselves further within Egypt and having to deal with that.

And as for the dehumanizing part: which party did deliberately chose to deliberately attack civilians and not "just" accepted them as collateral damage? Sure the latter is also horrible and should be kept to an absolute minimum but the first is absolutely indefensible. There's a reason why at every other pro-palestine rally right now there are people shouting to exterminate all the jews and why jews are scared wearing their kippah again: this whole thing is not just about standing with civilians in gaza but actually coming from an anti-semitic point a lot of the time.