hglman

I'm saying that if you need signals to reduce the risk of crashing you shouldn't drive, which is probably 98% of humans. That is the vast majority of people should drive.

You know the answer, why can't you admit it?

Keep up the cope, you shouldn't be driving.

I'm sorry that you're not good at driving but please stop using cars and putting others at risk.

By majority it's 100%, physics exists and the time required to maneuver in being capable of turning or lane changing is plenty to clearly signal what it will do. The reality is that if you need turn signals you are bad at driving and should not drive. Most humans are not capable and cars should not be how the majority of people get around.

Look at the lib escalate into a spiraling web of complexity in order to justify failure. No, the timeline here was unreasonable and will allow trump to win again. The Dems have served up a silver platter to the wealthy.

I mean the reasons exist but if the system cannot rapidly respond to attempts to destroy it then those attempts will succeed.

It's really funny to watch people cope with the reality that they are not skilled at using a car. People should not drive cars, cars killed tens of thousands of people.

That the charges weren't made until late last year is also a failure, the whole process has been unreasonable long.

The system doesn't want to save it's self, we are on a clear path towards fascism.