hglman

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well that is disappointing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Capitalist and the really all elites worldwide do not view us poors as being real humans. What that means here is that the actual artists you are talking about are not fellow wealthy people to those pushing AI replacing art. The capitalists only see a cost, something they believe to be stealing what belongs to them (bc they are insane and need medical care for mental health). What those capitalist aren't asking for is for is the artists they are contemporaries of to be replaced.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

High super consumption has much more impact on heart health than fats as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For what it's worth that person was on a motorcycle

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Odd, the Mayor of NYC is democratic.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Pork fat is less processed product and certainly more healthy. America isn't actually great at much but one thing we do have is the least healthy food to ever exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, the supreme Court gave itself that power. To that end the other branches could justifiably choose to not find that to be valid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

By Jan 2025 the only outcomes are Trump has won without conflict or the election is a contested mess and congress is deadlocked on certification and they will have moved to the vote by state in the house. In which case trump will be elected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Constitution doesn't empower the court to interpret the constitution. If the executive chose to ignore the court it would be perfectly legal.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually ment corporate ha

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's highlighting a potential significant risk. Major ozone loss is much worse than lack of internet. The high uncertainty of the paper is easily offset by the harm that would be caused if the paper is correct.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Doing scientific experiments to understand the risks is worth doing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›